The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Appeals Courts Rule Against DOJ Use of Acting U.S. Attorneys Without Senate Confirmation

Two appeals court panels ruled that the Department of Justice cannot bypass Senate confirmation by using internal titles to install acting U.S. attorneys.

Published August 23, 2026 at 6:00 AM EDT

The short answer

Two appeals court panels ruled that the Department of Justice cannot bypass Senate confirmation by using internal titles to install acting U.S. attorneys. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court after two federal appeals court panels ruled last week that the department cannot install acting U.S. attorneys by bypassing the Senate confirmation process.

Appeals Courts Rule Against DOJ Use of Acting U.S. Attorneys Without Senate Confirmation

The Facts

Who
Department of Justice, Sigal Chattah, John Sarcone III, and federal appeals court judges.
What
Appeals courts ruled against the DOJ's method of appointing acting U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation.
When
Last week
Where
2nd and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals
Why
The courts found that the DOJ violated the Federal Vacancy Reform Act by using administrative workarounds to keep unconfirmed officials in top prosecutor roles.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. January 1, 1998

    Federal Vacancy Reform Act passed by Congress

  2. April 1, 2025

    Sigal Chattah becomes interim U.S. attorney for Nevada

  3. September 1, 2025

    U.S. District Judge David Campbell finds Chattah not lawfully appointed

  4. December 1, 2025

    3rd Circuit panel upholds Alina Habba’s disqualification in New Jersey

  5. January 1, 2026

    U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield blocks Sarcone subpoenas in New York

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court after two federal appeals court panels ruled last week that the department cannot install acting U.S. attorneys by bypassing the Senate confirmation process. The panels for the 2nd and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals determined that the DOJ may not use title changes or the delegation of duties to keep unconfirmed officials in top prosecutor roles beyond statutory limits.

The rulings center on the Federal Vacancy Reform Act of 1998 (FVRA), which dictates how federal vacancies are filled. Under the law, U.S. attorneys must be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. When a vacancy occurs, the attorney general may appoint an interim successor for up to 120 days. The recent court challenges involve instances where the DOJ attempted to extend the tenure of these officials by designating them as "first assistants" or "special attorneys" after their 120-day terms expired.

The 9th Circuit ruling, which was unanimous, specifically disqualified Sigal Chattah from serving as the acting U.S. attorney for Nevada. Judge Eric Miller wrote that the FVRA does not allow the executive branch to fill a vacancy by designating a new first assistant who did not serve under a validly appointed official. In a separate 2-1 decision, the 2nd Circuit reached a similar conclusion regarding John Sarcone III in the Northern District of New York. A DOJ spokesperson stated the department disagrees with these rulings and plans to petition the Supreme Court for review.

For individuals involved in the federal legal system, the rulings have led to the dismissal of criminal cases and the blocking of grand jury subpoenas. For example, a judge in the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after ruling that Lindsey Halligan had been unlawfully appointed. The scale of the impact includes all defendants in cases supervised by these unconfirmed prosecutors, as their legal authority to bring charges or issue subpoenas has been successfully challenged in multiple jurisdictions.

The legal precedent set by these cases limits the power of the Attorney General to delegate the "functions and duties" of a U.S. attorney to anyone who has not undergone the formal confirmation process. If the Supreme Court declines to hear the case or upholds the lower court rulings, the administration will be required to submit formal nominations to the Senate to fill these vacancies. The DOJ has approximately 90 days from the date of the judgments to file a petition with the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the 4th Circuit is scheduled to hear a related dispute next month regarding the Eastern District of Virginia.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Appeals Courts Rule Against DOJ Use of Acting U.S. Attorneys Without Senate Confirmation?

Appeals courts ruled against the DOJ's method of appointing acting U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation.

Who is involved?

Department of Justice, Sigal Chattah, John Sarcone III, and federal appeals court judges.

When did this happen?

Last week

Where did this happen?

2nd and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals

Why does this matter?

The courts found that the DOJ violated the Federal Vacancy Reform Act by using administrative workarounds to keep unconfirmed officials in top prosecutor roles.