The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

Army Commander Reported to Have Rejected Safer Basing Plans Before Deadly Kuwait Strike

Military sources report a commander rejected safer basing options for U.S. troops in Kuwait before a March drone strike killed six service members.

Published September 25, 2026 at 4:06 AM EDT

The short answer

Military sources report a commander rejected safer basing options for U.S. troops in Kuwait before a March drone strike killed six service members. Sources told CBS News that a commanding general rejected relocation plans for U.S. troops in Kuwait shortly before a drone strike killed six service members on March 1, 2026.

Army Commander Reported to Have Rejected Safer Basing Plans Before Deadly Kuwait Strike

The Facts

Who
Brig. Gen. Clint Barnes, the 103rd Sustainment Command, and U.S. Army intelligence.
What
A commanding general reportedly rejected plans to rebase U.S. troops to safer locations in Saudi Arabia before a deadly drone strike in Kuwait.
When
The strike occurred on March 1, 2026; reports of the rejected plans emerged in late September 2026.
Where
Port of Shuaiba, Kuwait
Why
To investigate whether the deaths of six U.S. service members could have been prevented by following intelligence recommendations to move farther from Iranian range.

Sources told CBS News that a commanding general rejected relocation plans for U.S. troops in Kuwait shortly before a drone strike killed six service members on March 1, 2026. The 103rd Sustainment Command, an Army Reserve unit, was moved to the Port of Shuaiba, located 65 miles from Iran, despite intelligence briefings in January identifying the site as a potential target. Alternative options to move personnel to bases in western Saudi Arabia, farther from Iranian missile range, were reportedly scouted but not utilized.

Brig. Gen. Clint Barnes, the unit's commander, opted to move the unit to the port following a precedent set by a previous unit during an Iran-Israel conflict in July 2025. Military sources characterized the Shuaiba location as an "easy button" compared to establishing operations at Logistical Support Area Jenkins or Prince Sultan Air Force Base. While the Pentagon declined to comment on the specific decision, officials previously stated that the facility was fortified with six-foot walls and that all possible measures were taken to protect the troops.

The March 1 attack resulted in six deaths and more than 20 injuries. Survivors and family members of the deceased have alleged that the post lacked adequate medical personnel, supplies, and defensive fortifications. According to witness accounts, soldiers were forced to use makeshift bandages and civilian vehicles to transport the wounded to local hospitals. An internal Army probe into the circumstances of the attack was completed in early July, but the results have not yet been released to the public or the victims' families.

The reported scale of the incident involves dozens of troops who were present during the bombardment. The specific impact on these individuals includes physical injuries, long-term healthcare needs, and the loss of life. Families of the fallen, such as the parents of Maj. Cody Khork, have stated that their relatives warned leadership about the site's vulnerability before the strike occurred. A lack of immediate medical resources, such as a fixed aid station or sufficient ambulances at the site, meant that wounded soldiers had to manage their own triage and seek care at Kuwaiti civilian hospitals.

Congress is now involved, with more than 20 Democrats urging the House and Senate Armed Services Committees to hold public hearings. The requested hearings aim to determine why the Department of Defense was not prepared for the strike and to address concerns regarding the medical care provided to survivors. While a Senate resolution to limit presidential war powers in Iran failed in a 49-50 vote on Thursday, the ongoing scrutiny of the March 1 strike could shape future legislative debates regarding military oversight and the authorization of force. The Army has asked for patience as it reviews the findings of its completed probe, but has not set a date for its release.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. July 2025

    12-day war between Israel and Iran occurs; U.S. unit moves to Shuaiba

  2. September 2025

    103rd Sustainment Command arrives in Kuwait

  3. January 2026

    Army intelligence briefs leadership on Shuaiba as a potential target

  4. March 1, 2026

    Iranian drone strike kills six U.S. service members at Port of Shuaiba

  5. July 2026

    U.S. Army completes internal probe into the attack

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Army Commander Reported to Have Rejected Safer Basing Plans Before Deadly Kuwait Strike?

A commanding general reportedly rejected plans to rebase U.S. troops to safer locations in Saudi Arabia before a deadly drone strike in Kuwait.

Who is involved?

Brig. Gen. Clint Barnes, the 103rd Sustainment Command, and U.S. Army intelligence.

When did this happen?

The strike occurred on March 1, 2026; reports of the rejected plans emerged in late September 2026.

Where did this happen?

Port of Shuaiba, Kuwait

Why does this matter?

To investigate whether the deaths of six U.S. service members could have been prevented by following intelligence recommendations to move farther from Iranian range.