The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

Bipartisan Senators Demand Rescission of Russian Diesel Deal

Six Republicans and six Democrats sent a letter to President Trump demanding he cancel a deal to import Russian diesel fuel, citing potential violations of federal law.

By The Plain RecordUpdated October 13, 2026 at 6:05 PM EDT
Published October 12, 2026 at 8:00 PM EDT

The short answer

Six Republicans and six Democrats sent a letter to President Trump demanding he cancel a deal to import Russian diesel fuel, citing potential violations of federal law.

Updates (3)

  • Update — October 13, 2026 at 6:05 PM EDT: A bipartisan group of senators is challenging President Trump’s deal to import Russian diesel, citing violations of a 2022 energy ban.
  • Update — October 13, 2026 at 5:20 PM EDT: President Trump reached a deal with Russia to import diesel fuel through 2027, drawing a legal challenge from a bipartisan group of 12 senators.
  • Update — October 13, 2026 at 5:05 PM EDT: The senators are questioning the legality of the decision, citing Congress’ 2022 ban on Russian energy imports.
Bipartisan Senators Demand Rescission of Russian Diesel Deal

The Facts

Who
A bipartisan group of 12 senators, including Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and President Donald Trump.
What
A bipartisan group of 12 senators sent a letter to President Trump demanding the cancellation of a deal to import Russian diesel, arguing it violates federal law and provides financial support to Russia during its war with Ukraine.
When
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
The senators argue the deal violates federal law and funds the Russian military, while the president maintains it is necessary to lower global fuel prices during an energy shortage.

A bipartisan group of 12 senators sent a letter to President Donald Trump on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, requesting that he rescind a recent agreement with Russian President Vladimir Putin to import diesel fuel. The group, consisting of six Republicans and six Democrats, characterized the deal as a "betrayal of the people of Ukraine" and a financial benefit to the Russian government during its ongoing conflict with Ukraine. The senators urged the president to withdraw from the agreement and rescind a Treasury Department move to waive sanctions that allows Russian diesel imports into the global market.

The deal follows an announcement by President Trump on Friday, October 9, 2026, stating that Russia would supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel to the American and global markets. The president cited the need to lower energy costs amid a seven-month war with Iran, which contributed to average diesel prices reaching a record $6.53 per gallon in September. Following the announcement, the Treasury Department issued a general license to facilitate these imports, which the senators argue violates federal law.

In their letter, the senators acknowledged the need to address high energy costs but argued that the Russian deal would provide "limited to no relief to Americans" while funding the Russian military. The group included Republican Senators Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Thom Tillis, and Alan Armstrong, along with Democratic Senators Jeanne Shaheen, Richard Blumenthal, Dick Durbin, Jack Reed, Chris Coons, and Sheldon Whitehouse. Separately, Sen. Tillis stated on Sunday that there is a legitimate case for saying the president is not following the law, which senators noted requires economic pressure on Russia to end the conflict.

The challenge to the deal also highlights a legal conflict over executive versus legislative power regarding foreign sanctions. Senators claim the administration bypassed a statute that prohibits Russian energy imports or requires economic pressure. If the Treasury Department's general license remains in effect, Russian diesel could continue to enter the market through April 2027. This sets a precedent for how the executive branch might use general licenses to navigate statutory bans during periods of high inflation or global energy instability.

Currently, the White House has not indicated plans to rescind the agreement, referring instead to President Trump's social media posts describing an "energy ceasefire" and his comments that the fuel is for the "world market" to address high prices. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stated that easing sanctions without a de-escalation agreement signals weakness. The next steps depend on whether the administration responds to the congressional demand or if lawmakers pursue further legislative action to enforce the import ban. No specific court dates or votes were reported.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 2022

    Congress passes ban on Russian energy imports

  2. September 16, 2026

    House passes additional Russia sanctions legislation

  3. October 9, 2026

    Trump announces diesel deal with Putin and Treasury issues import license

  4. October 11, 2026

    Sen. Tillis questions legality of deal; senators release statement of opposition

  5. October 13, 2026

    Bipartisan group of 12 senators sends formal letter to the president

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Bipartisan Senators Demand Rescission of Russian Diesel Deal?

A bipartisan group of 12 senators sent a letter to President Trump demanding the cancellation of a deal to import Russian diesel, arguing it violates federal law and provides financial support to Russia during its war with Ukraine.

Who is involved?

A bipartisan group of 12 senators, including Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and President Donald Trump.

When did this happen?

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C.

Why does this matter?

The senators argue the deal violates federal law and funds the Russian military, while the president maintains it is necessary to lower global fuel prices during an energy shortage.