The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

California Officials Criticize Trump Remarks on Potential Iranian Attacks on U.S. Cities

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom criticized President Trump after he suggested Iranian attacks on L.A. or San Diego would be a "small price to pay."

Background: Impeachment and removal

By The Plain RecordUpdated October 8, 2026 at 6:48 PM EDT
Published October 7, 2026 at 7:57 AM EDT

The short answer

California officials criticized President Trump for remarks about potential Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) and other California officials criticized statements made by President Donald Trump regarding the potential for Iranian attacks on U.S. cities.

Updates (4)

  • Update — October 8, 2026 at 6:48 PM EDT: White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said President Trump was describing how to prevent Iranian attacks, not calling for them, after a campaign rally speech.
  • Update — October 8, 2026 at 5:48 PM EDT: White House aides clarified that President Trump's mention of Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego was intended to highlight the importance of stopping a nuclear Iran.
  • Update — October 8, 2026 at 3:48 AM EDT: The White House said Tuesday that President Trump’s rally comments regarding Iran and California cities were meant to illustrate threats he is working to prevent.
  • Update — October 7, 2026 at 12:18 PM EDT: The White House clarified that President Trump's remarks about Iranian threats to California cities were intended to highlight his efforts to prevent such attacks.
California Officials Criticize Trump Remarks on Potential Iranian Attacks on U.S. Cities

The Facts

Who
President Donald Trump, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Governor Gavin Newsom, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria
What
California officials criticized President Trump for remarks about potential Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego.
When
Monday, October 5, and Tuesday, October 6, 2026
Where
Grand Island, Nebraska and Los Angeles, California
Why
To report on the dispute between California leadership and the White House regarding rhetoric about foreign military threats to U.S. cities.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) and other California officials criticized statements made by President Donald Trump regarding the potential for Iranian attacks on U.S. cities. During a campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska, on Monday, October 5, 2026, Trump discussed the conflict with Iran and the resulting economic impact, suggesting that an attack on Los Angeles or San Diego would be a "small price to pay" for national security.

The remarks were made as Trump addressed a crowd of supporters, defending U.S. military involvement with Iran and current energy costs. During the speech, he said, "They can take out a city — let them take out Los Angeles, let them take out San Diego. This is a very small price to pay." The White House later stated that the remarks were intended to illustrate that U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear-armed Iran had not been stopped.

Mayor Bass told MS NOW on Tuesday, October 6, that she was "horrified" by the comments, stating that a president should not speak of major U.S. cities as a "potential cost of war." San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria also responded on social media, stating that his city is not "collateral damage" or "expendable." California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) said he directed the California State Threat Assessment Center to monitor the situation to ensure foreign actors did not interpret the remarks as an invitation to target the state.

The scale of the reported impact involves two of the nation's most populous metropolitan areas. A change that residents may notice includes increased activity by the California State Threat Assessment Center, which Governor Newsom directed to monitor foreign actor interpretations of the president’s rhetoric. Additionally, Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA) noted that the comments affect constituents in her district, including service members and their families who reside in the San Diego area.

Knock-on effects include potential diplomatic and security precedents regarding how a sitting president characterizes domestic targets. Mayor Bass stated that the rhetoric could "potentially compromise our safety" and called for an official apology and explanation. What happens next involves the continued monitoring of foreign actor responses by state security agencies; however, Mayor Bass noted on October 6 that she was not currently aware of any active threats to Southern California resulting from the conflict. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung stated that the administration's stance is that confronting Iran has prevented greater threats to U.S. cities.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. October 5, 2026

    Nebraska Campaign Rally

    Trump discusses the Iran conflict and mentions Los Angeles and San Diego at a Grand Island rally.

  2. October 6, 2026

    California Leaders Respond

    Mayor Karen Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom issue statements criticizing the rally remarks.

  3. October 6, 2026

    White House Issues Clarification

    Steven Cheung states the remarks were about threats prevented by U.S. policy.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: California Officials Criticize Trump Remarks on Potential Iranian Attacks on U.S. Cities?

California officials criticized President Trump for remarks about potential Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego.

Who is involved?

President Donald Trump, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Governor Gavin Newsom, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria

When did this happen?

Monday, October 5, and Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Where did this happen?

Grand Island, Nebraska and Los Angeles, California

Why does this matter?

To report on the dispute between California leadership and the White House regarding rhetoric about foreign military threats to U.S. cities.