The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

Crypto and AI Super PACs Spend $127 Million to Shape Congressional Primaries

Super PACs backed by crypto and AI interests spent $127 million to win roughly 90% of their targeted primary races ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Background: The power of the purse, explained: appropriations, impoundment and who controls federal spending

Published September 5, 2026 at 9:12 PM EDT

The short answer

Super PACs backed by crypto and AI interests spent $127 million to win roughly 90% of their targeted primary races ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Crypto and AI Super PACs Spend $127 Million to Shape Congressional Primaries

The Facts

Who
Fairshake (crypto PAC), Leading the Future (AI PAC), Public First Action (AI PAC), and various U.S. House and Senate candidates.
What
Political spending by tech-linked super PACs in primary elections.
When
During the 2026 primary election cycle through September 2026.
Where
United States, with specific races in Illinois, New York, North Carolina, and Michigan.
Why
To influence the legislative makeup of the next Congress regarding AI and cryptocurrency regulations.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 2024

    Fairshake super PAC launches during the 2024 election cycle.

  2. December 19, 2025

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul signs the AI safety Raise Act into law.

  3. January 28, 2026

    Reports indicate crypto super PACs have built a significant war chest.

  4. July 31, 2026

    Fairshake and affiliates report nearly $123 million in cash on hand.

  5. September 3, 2026

    Analysis shows tech groups won 90% of over 100 primary races.

Super PACs representing cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence interests spent $127 million across more than 100 primary elections this year. According to a POLITICO analysis of Federal Election Commission data, these groups won approximately 90% of the races in which they participated. The spending reflects a rapid increase in political activity for these tech sectors, with at least one in six members of the next Congress expected to have received their backing.

The success rates varied by political party and the level of competition. In Republican primaries, the groups maintained a nearly perfect record, often aligning their spending with endorsements from former President Donald Trump. In Democratic contests, the results were more mixed. While the groups secured numerous wins, they lost several high-profile races where their financial involvement became a campaign topic or where they faced opposition from other well-funded organizations.

Several distinct networks drove the spending. Fairshake, a pro-cryptocurrency super PAC funded by Coinbase, Ripple Labs, and Andreessen Horowitz, led the effort alongside two affiliated PACs for Democrats and Republicans. The AI sector was represented by Leading the Future, funded by executives like OpenAI’s Greg Brockman, and Public First Action, a nonprofit backed by Anthropic that advocates for AI regulation. Public First Action co-founder and former Rep. Brad Carson (D-Okla.) stated the group formed its own super PACs to provide a counterweight to other industry spending.

The scale of the spending reached record levels for individual primary contests. In New York’s 12th District, four tech-linked groups spent a combined $25 million in a single race. In other contests, single entities spent more than $10 million, a level that Rich Barton of Unite America said lacks precedent for primary elections. For individual candidates, this meant receiving significant boosts; Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-N.C.) won her primary by roughly one percentage point following $1.6 million in support from an AI-linked PAC. However, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) lost his seat despite $2 million in support from Fairshake, and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi lost a Democratic Senate primary in Illinois despite nearly $10 million in spending from the same group.

This spending sets a new precedent for how emerging industries attempt to shape public policy by intervening early in the electoral process. Rather than focusing solely on general elections, these groups used the relatively lower costs of primaries to install preferred candidates before the November vote. Looking ahead, these organizations maintain significant resources for the general election; Fairshake and its affiliates reported nearly $123 million in cash on hand at the end of July 2026. This suggests that the tech sector's influence on the composition of Congress will continue through the midterm elections and into the next legislative session.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Crypto and AI Super PACs Spend $127 Million to Shape Congressional Primaries?

Super PACs representing cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence interests spent $127 million across more than 100 primary elections this year. According to a POLITICO analysis of Federal Election Commission data, these groups won approximately 90% of the races in which they participated.

Who is involved?

Fairshake (crypto PAC), Leading the Future (AI PAC), Public First Action (AI PAC), and various U.S. House and Senate candidates.

When did this happen?

During the 2026 primary election cycle through September 2026.

Where did this happen?

United States, with specific races in Illinois, New York, North Carolina, and Michigan.

Why does this matter?

To influence the legislative makeup of the next Congress regarding AI and cryptocurrency regulations.