The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Federal judges allow end of deportation protections for South Sudan and Myanmar migrants

Federal judges in Boston and Chicago ruled that the Department of Homeland Security has the authority to end Temporary Protected Status for about 4,200 migrants.

By The Plain Record, sourced from Reuters
Published August 7, 2026 at 12:20 PM EDT
Federal judges allow end of deportation protections for South Sudan and Myanmar migrants

The Facts

Who
U.S. District Judges Patti Saris and Matthew Kennelly, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and approximately 4,232 migrants from South Sudan and Myanmar.
What
Federal court rulings allowing the termination of Temporary Protected Status for South Sudan and Myanmar.
When
Friday, August 7, 2026
Where
Boston, Massachusetts and Chicago, Illinois
Why
The judges determined that DHS has the authority to terminate TPS designations, following a Supreme Court precedent that limited judicial review of such executive branch decisions.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 2011

    South Sudan first designated for Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

  2. February 1, 2021

    Myanmar military seize power in a coup, leading to TPS designation

  3. June 25, 2026

    U.S. Supreme Court allows termination of TPS for Haiti and Syria

  4. August 7, 2026

    Judges in Boston and Chicago reject challenges to ending TPS for South Sudan and Myanmar

Two federal judges on Friday issued rulings that allow the Trump administration to proceed with plans to end deportation protections for thousands of people from South Sudan and Myanmar. The decisions by U.S. District Judges Patti Saris in Boston and Matthew Kennelly in Chicago lifted previous orders that had blocked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from terminating the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for these two nations.

The rulings follow a June decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that permitted the administration to end similar protections for individuals from Haiti and Syria. That 6-3 Supreme Court ruling limited the authority of lower-court judges to review DHS efforts to end TPS for approximately one dozen countries. TPS is a program that provides temporary protection from deportation and work authorization to eligible migrants from countries experiencing natural disasters, armed conflicts, or other extraordinary events.

In their new legal challenge, immigrant-rights lawyers argued that DHS lacked the authority to terminate TPS, contending that only the attorney general held that power. Judge Saris rejected this argument, stating it would also call into question the department's longstanding authority to extend such protections. DHS general counsel James Percival stated that following these rulings, only the protections for Ethiopia and Somalia remain blocked by the courts.

The concrete day-to-day change for these residents will involve the expiration of their right to hold jobs legally in the U.S. and a change in their legal status that makes them subject to removal by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. While the source does not provide the specific calendar dates for when these work permits expire, the DHS move to terminate these designations began in November. The loss of income for 4,232 households could affect local economies and personal financial stability, as these individuals will no longer be permitted to remain in the U.S. workforce.

The rulings establish a precedent that reinforces the executive branch's authority, specifically through the Department of Homeland Security, to end humanitarian designations without extensive lower-court intervention. This aligns with the recent Supreme Court guidance that curtailed judicial review of these administrative actions. What happens next depends on potential further appeals or the implementation of final termination dates by DHS. Currently, the department continues to face legal blocks regarding TPS for Ethiopia and Somalia, but Percival has urged other courts to follow these latest precedents.

This story was rewritten from reporting at Reuters. Read the original for full detail.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page