The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Former Prosecutors Say Trump Media Plan to Sell Early Access to Posts is Likely Criminal

Former federal prosecutors told a New York court that Trump Media's Truth API, which charges up to $100,000 a month, likely violates federal insider trading and corruption laws.

Published September 21, 2026 at 8:06 PM EDT

The short answer

Former federal prosecutors told a New York court that Trump Media's Truth API, which charges up to $100,000 a month, likely violates federal insider trading and corruption laws.

Former Prosecutors Say Trump Media Plan to Sell Early Access to Posts is Likely Criminal

The Facts

Who
53 former federal prosecutors/agents, Trump Media & Technology Group, President Donald Trump, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD)
What
Former federal prosecutors filed a brief supporting a lawsuit against a Trump Media service that sells early access to Truth Social posts, alleging it violates insider trading and corruption laws.
When
Monday (court filing); August 1, 2026 (service launch)
Where
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Why
The service charges up to $100,000 per month for early access to market-moving information, raising questions about constitutional rights and illegal insider trading.

A group of 53 former federal prosecutors and agents filed a proposed amicus brief Monday in federal court, stating that a Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) service selling early access to Truth Social posts likely violates federal laws. The filing supports a lawsuit brought by The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation, which seeks a preliminary injunction to block the transmission of early access to President Donald Trump's posts. The plaintiffs argue the service, known as Truth API, is unconstitutional under the First and Fifth Amendments.

The Truth API service, which launched August 1, 2026, charges subscribers up to $100,000 per month for faster access to posts from high-ranking Truth Social accounts. According to TMTG executives, more than 10 customers, primarily high-frequency trading firms, signed up for the feed. The former prosecutors' brief alleges the business model likely violates the Securities Exchange Act, the Trade Secrets Act, and federal prohibitions on illegal gratuities and conflicts of interest. The lawsuit names President Trump, executive assistant Natalie Harp, and White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino as defendants.

In their filing, the former law enforcement officials argued the arrangement creates an "obvious risk of corruption" by selling advance access to market-moving information. The brief provided a hypothetical example where the President could announce new tariffs; a paid subscriber receiving that information early could sell stocks before the news causes prices to drop. Former officials who signed the brief include Michael Bromwich, a former inspector general, and Ty Cobb, a former White House counsel during the first Trump administration.

The day-to-day change for the public involves how and when they receive official government information. If the injunction is not granted, journalists and the public would receive the president's policy announcements—which have previously covered tariffs and military actions—after paid subscribers. This sets a precedent regarding whether a sitting president can monetize official communications through a private company. TMTG reported a $238 million loss in the second quarter of 2026, and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has characterized the service as an attempt to extract profit from a struggling firm while the president maintains a trust owning more than 40% of the company's shares.

The legal proceedings will determine if executive branch officials can be held criminally liable under insider trading and public corruption laws for providing preferential access to policy data. TMTG has defended the service, stating that monetizing platform data is a common practice among technology companies. The next major step is a hearing on the request for a preliminary injunction, which is scheduled for Oct. 7 at the federal courthouse in Manhattan. Separately, Rep. Raskin has launched an investigation, demanding records related to the development and marketing of the Truth API.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. July 31, 2026

    Rep. Jamie Raskin launches House Judiciary Committee investigation

  2. August 1, 2026

    Truth API service officially launches for subscribers

  3. August 10, 2026

    TMTG reports $238 million second-quarter loss

  4. August 12, 2026

    Media groups file federal lawsuit in Southern District of New York

  5. October 7, 2026

    Scheduled hearing for preliminary injunction in Manhattan

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Former Prosecutors Say Trump Media Plan to Sell Early Access to Posts is Likely Criminal?

Former federal prosecutors filed a brief supporting a lawsuit against a Trump Media service that sells early access to Truth Social posts, alleging it violates insider trading and corruption laws.

Who is involved?

53 former federal prosecutors/agents, Trump Media & Technology Group, President Donald Trump, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD)

When did this happen?

Monday (court filing); August 1, 2026 (service launch)

Where did this happen?

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Why does this matter?

The service charges up to $100,000 per month for early access to market-moving information, raising questions about constitutional rights and illegal insider trading.