The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

FTC settles price discrimination lawsuit with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits

The FTC reached a settlement with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits over claims it charged smaller retailers higher prices than large chains.

Published October 2, 2026 at 6:26 PM EDT

The short answer

The FTC reached a settlement with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits over claims it charged smaller retailers higher prices than large chains. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a settlement Friday, October 2, 2026, with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits LLC to resolve a 2024 lawsuit alleging the company engaged in illegal price discrimination.

FTC settles price discrimination lawsuit with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits

The Facts

Who
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits LLC
What
A settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits regarding allegations of discriminatory pricing against small businesses.
When
Friday, October 2, 2026
Where
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Why
To resolve allegations that the distributor violated the Robinson-Patman Act by favoring large chain retailers with discounts not available to independent stores.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a settlement Friday, October 2, 2026, with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits LLC to resolve a 2024 lawsuit alleging the company engaged in illegal price discrimination. The agreement aims to prevent the distributor from charging small, independent retailers significantly higher prices than large chain stores for identical products. Under the terms of the settlement, Southern Glazer’s will face limitations on pricing and must compensate independent businesses if future violations occur.

The lawsuit, filed in December 2024, alleged that Southern Glazer’s violated the Robinson-Patman Act by providing discounts and rebates to large competitors, such as Walmart, Kroger, and Total Wine, while denying them to smaller retailers. The 1936 law permits volume discounts only if the seller can demonstrate actual cost efficiencies from bulk sales. The FTC claimed Southern Glazer’s charged higher prices to independent stores even when they were located within a few blocks of large chain competitors.

Southern Glazer’s reached the agreement without admitting wrongdoing. Alan Greenspan, the company's chief legal and compliance officer, stated that the company was not in violation of the law and does not anticipate material changes to its business practices. The settlement covers sales to the five largest chain retailers across 26 states, including California, Texas, Florida, and New York.

For the consumer, the FTC stated the goal is to level the playing field so small businesses can compete. By creating a financial penalty for "paired transactions"—where a chain and a nearby independent store receive different prices for the same goods—the order incentivizes more uniform pricing. Independent retailers will see this impact if they have been paying higher wholesale costs that previously forced them to charge higher retail prices or accept lower profit margins than larger neighbors like Walmart or Kroger.

The settlement sets a precedent for the enforcement of the Robinson-Patman Act, a law the FTC described as not having seen a major enforcement action in a generation. The order remains in effect for six years and will be overseen by an independent monitor. Southern Glazer’s is required to provide the monitor with detailed records twice a year to ensure compliance. The proposed stipulated order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on October 2, 2026.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. December 2024

    FTC files lawsuit against Southern Glazer’s under Robinson-Patman Act

  2. January 20, 2025

    Andrew Ferguson named FTC chairman as President Trump takes office

  3. April 2025

    Federal court denies Southern Glazer’s motion to dismiss the case

  4. October 2, 2026

    FTC and Southern Glazer’s file proposed settlement in U.S. District Court

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: FTC settles price discrimination lawsuit with Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits?

A settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits regarding allegations of discriminatory pricing against small businesses.

Who is involved?

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits LLC

When did this happen?

Friday, October 2, 2026

Where did this happen?

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Why does this matter?

To resolve allegations that the distributor violated the Robinson-Patman Act by favoring large chain retailers with discounts not available to independent stores.