The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

Leon Black sues House Oversight Committee to block subpoenas in Epstein probe

Investor Leon Black sued the House Oversight Committee on Thursday to block subpoenas for his testimony and documents regarding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

By The Plain RecordUpdated September 4, 2026 at 1:40 PM EDT
Published September 3, 2026 at 10:20 AM EDT

The short answer

Investor Leon Black sued the House Oversight Committee on Thursday to block subpoenas for his testimony and documents regarding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Investor Leon Black filed a lawsuit against the House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Thursday, September 3, 2026, seeking to invalidate subpoenas requiring his testimony and the production of documents.

Updates (5)

  • Update — September 4, 2026 at 1:40 PM EDT: Wall Street billionaire Leon Black on Thursday sued a congressional committee that had ordered ​him to provide lawmakers with copies of non-disclosure agreements as part of a probe into the activities of the late convicted ‌sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
  • Update — September 4, 2026 at 1:12 AM EDT: The billionaire investor is under two subpoenas from the House Oversight Committee. But in his lawsuit, Black says the panel doesn't have the authority to compel him to share nondisclosure agreements.
  • Update — September 3, 2026 at 10:50 AM EDT: Leon Black filed a federal lawsuit Thursday to block House Oversight Committee subpoenas, skipping a scheduled deposition regarding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • Update — September 3, 2026 at 10:20 AM EDT: Lawmakers originally served Black with two subpoenas during a private voluntary interview in June after he reportedly declined to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements
  • Update — September 3, 2026 at 10:20 AM EDT: Committee leaders could pursue contempt proceedings against the billionaire investor.
Leon Black sues House Oversight Committee to block subpoenas in Epstein probe

The Facts

Who
Leon Black and the House Oversight and Accountability Committee
What
Leon Black filed a lawsuit to invalidate congressional subpoenas.
When
Thursday, September 3, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
Black argues the subpoenas seek private information unrelated to a legitimate legislative purpose, while the committee seeks to understand Epstein's network.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 2021

    Black steps down as CEO of Apollo Global Management

  2. June 26, 2026

    Black appears for voluntary transcribed interview; committee issues subpoenas

  3. August 18, 2026

    Chairman Comer threatens Black with contempt proceedings over NDA production

  4. September 3, 2026

    Black files federal lawsuit and skips scheduled congressional deposition

Investor Leon Black filed a lawsuit against the House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Thursday, September 3, 2026, seeking to invalidate subpoenas requiring his testimony and the production of documents. The legal action was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on the same day Black was scheduled for a transcribed deposition before the committee. Black, the co-founder of Apollo Global Management, declined to attend the scheduled session, prompting Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) to state he would discuss next steps with members.

The litigation follows a June voluntary appearance by Black before the committee. During that session, Black reportedly refused to answer questions regarding nondisclosure agreements (NDAs). In response, Comer issued two subpoenas demanding a videotaped deposition and information related to the NDAs. The committee is investigating Jeffrey Epstein to determine how he avoided scrutiny for decades. Black has acknowledged paying Epstein $158 million for wealth management advice between 2013 and 2017 but maintains he was unaware of Epstein's illegal activities until 2019.

Black's lawsuit argues that the subpoenas lack a "legitimate connection" to a legislative purpose and seek private information that exceeds the committee’s authority. His attorney, Susan Estrich, stated that the investigation has become an "abuse of Congressional power" and a "fishing expedition" intended to damage Black's reputation. The legal filing claims that producing the NDAs would compromise the privacy of women who have no public connection to Epstein. Black has already produced one NDA involving a $9.5 million payment to a woman with whom he had an affair, but Comer characterized this as insufficient.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), the committee's ranking member, called for Black to be held in contempt of Congress for defying the subpoenas. Garcia stated that Black "funded Epstein's abuse and trafficking of women," citing the $180 million total Black allegedly paid Epstein over six years. The committee previously released emails from 2015 showing Epstein advising Black on negotiations with a former Russian model. The committee's investigation has also included interviews or testimony from other figures, including Bill Gates, Les Wexner, and Howard Lutnick.

For the individuals involved, the outcome determines whether private settlements and personal correspondence will remain confidential or become part of the public record. Specifically, the ruling will impact the privacy of multiple women who entered into NDAs with Black; his attorneys argue these women have no connection to Epstein and bargained for confidentiality. The committee asserts that Epstein’s involvement in negotiating at least one of these agreements makes them relevant to understanding how he used his influence.

The scale of the financial relationship is central to the dispute, involving reported payments of $158 million to $180 million over a six-year period. The committee is attempting to determine if these payments facilitated Epstein's criminal activity. The next steps include a potential vote by the House Oversight Committee on whether to hold Black in contempt, while a federal judge in D.C. will review Black's request to strike down the subpoenas. No specific court date has been announced for the lawsuit.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Leon Black sues House Oversight Committee to block subpoenas in Epstein probe?

Investor Leon Black filed a lawsuit against the House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Thursday, September 3, 2026, seeking to invalidate subpoenas requiring his testimony and the production of documents. The legal action was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on the same day Black was scheduled for a transcribed deposition before the committee.

Who is involved?

Leon Black and the House Oversight and Accountability Committee

When did this happen?

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C.

Why does this matter?

Black argues the subpoenas seek private information unrelated to a legitimate legislative purpose, while the committee seeks to understand Epstein's network.