The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

Massie introduces bill to restrict federal funding for biometric surveillance cameras

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced the Flock-Off Act to block federal funding for automated license plate readers and biometric surveillance cameras used by local law enforcement.

Published September 3, 2026 at 2:21 PM EDT

The short answer

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced the Flock-Off Act to block federal funding for automated license plate readers and biometric surveillance cameras used by local law enforcement.

Massie introduces bill to restrict federal funding for biometric surveillance cameras

The Facts

Who
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO)
What
legislation to prohibit federal funds for ALPRs and biometric cameras
When
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
To prevent federal taxpayer money from funding automated surveillance systems and biometric data collection by local law enforcement.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) introduced the "Flock-Off Act" on Wednesday, September 2, 2026, to prohibit the use of federal funds for automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and biometric surveillance cameras. The legislation, designated as H.R. 10221, would block municipalities and local law enforcement from using federal money to purchase, install, maintain, or upgrade these technologies.

The bill follows increasing use of AI-driven systems by law enforcement, such as those provided by the company Flock Safety. These systems go beyond standard traffic cameras by recording license plate numbers and unique vehicle characteristics to create "vehicle signatures." Biometric data covered by the bill includes facial recognition, voiceprints, fingerprints, eye scans, and gait recognition. Massie stated that federal taxpayers should not be forced to fund what he described as a "surveillance state," while Burlison cited Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.

Under the proposed terms, federal agencies would be required to remove any federally funded systems, and local recipients would have to cease operations of such technology within 180 days to maintain eligibility for federal program funding. The bill also prohibits federal funding for subscriptions, data-sharing agreements, or cloud services related to these cameras. It includes exceptions for cameras used for toll collection and for those located within one mile of the U.S. northern and southern borders to detect drug smuggling, human trafficking, and unlawful entry.

The impact involves the potential withholding of federal program funds. While the total dollar amount was not reported, the bill requires recipients to reimburse the U.S. Treasury for the full amount of federal funds already obligated toward these systems before further funding can be released. For a local police department, this could mean losing a portion of its equipment budget or facing the cost of removing existing hardware. The legislation targets a broad sector of the technology market, including companies like Axon and Flock Safety, by banning any "contract, subscription, license, or data-sharing agreement" funded by federal dollars.

If passed, local recipients would be required to deactivate or remove license plate readers and biometric cameras within 180 days to maintain funding eligibility. The effects could include the termination of data-sharing arrangements between different law enforcement jurisdictions and a shift in how municipalities prioritize their public safety spending. The bill has received bipartisan support from original cosponsors including Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), and Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN). The next steps for the legislation involve committee review in the House of Representatives.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Massie introduces bill to restrict federal funding for biometric surveillance cameras?

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) introduced the "Flock-Off Act" on Wednesday, September 2, 2026, to prohibit the use of federal funds for automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and biometric surveillance cameras. The legislation, designated as H.R. 10221, would block municipalities and local law enforcement from using federal money to purchase, install, maintain, or upgrade these technologies.

Who is involved?

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO)

When did this happen?

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C.

Why does this matter?

To prevent federal taxpayer money from funding automated surveillance systems and biometric data collection by local law enforcement.