The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

MPs Seek to Roll Back Police Immunity Ruling in England and Wales

U.K. lawmakers and the Supreme Court are considering measures to limit police immunity following a ruling that protects officers from lawsuits related to investigative failings.

Background: How the Supreme Court takes a case

Published October 10, 2026 at 7:04 PM EDT

The short answer

U.K. lawmakers and the Supreme Court are considering measures to limit police immunity following a ruling that protects officers from lawsuits related to investigative failings.

MPs Seek to Roll Back Police Immunity Ruling in England and Wales

The Facts

Who
Andrew Mitchell (Conservative MP), Jess Phillips (Labour MP), U.K. Court of Appeal, U.S. Supreme Court, and victims of police negligence.
What
Legislative and judicial efforts to overturn a ruling that provides police with immunity from civil lawsuits regarding investigative failings.
When
October 2026
Where
United Kingdom and United States
Why
To address concerns that victims of crime are unable to seek legal redress when police fabricate evidence, act negligently, or disclose confidential information.

Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom are seeking to amend legislation to prevent police officers from using legal immunity to block lawsuits involving investigative failings. The proposed amendment, submitted by Andrew Mitchell (Conservative) and Jess Phillips (Labour), follows a 2025 Court of Appeal ruling that expanded "core immunity" for officers in England and Wales. This ruling currently protects police from civil litigation regarding conduct or statements made during criminal investigations, as well as their roles as witnesses.

The 2025 judgment originated from a case involving a domestic violence survivor whose secret refuge address was disclosed to her abuser after Sussex Police included the information in a file sent to the Crown Prosecution Service. Although the woman argued the breach caused psychiatric injury and loss of earnings, the Court of Appeal held that immunity extends to a broad range of investigative activities, blocking most legal claims, including those involving data breaches or human rights matters.

The proposed amendment, scheduled for debate on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, specifies that immunity would not apply to police actions in preparation for criminal proceedings, particularly in cases of fabricated evidence, dishonesty, or negligence. Separately, the U.K. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear an appeal this month that could also overturn the 2025 ruling. Meanwhile, in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned opinion on March 23, 2026, reversing a lower court's decision that had denied qualified immunity for a Vermont detective accused of using excessive force during a 2015 protest.

The scale of the impact is highlighted by cases like that of Ali Kololo, a Kenyan man who spent 11 years in prison after a wrongful conviction. Kololo is currently suing the Metropolitan Police, who have stated they will rely on the core immunity principle in their defense. For a claimant, the current immunity rule means that even if a data breach or negligent investigation leads to physical harm or loss of employment, they cannot recover the costs of those damages from the police department responsible. In the U.S. context, the March 2026 Supreme Court decision reinforced that officers are shielded from personal liability unless their specific conduct was clearly established as a violation by prior case law.

Knock-on effects include the potential for increased pressure on internal police misconduct processes and the criminal courts, which remain avenues for holding officers accountable under current immunity standards. If the Parliament amendment passes or the Supreme Court overturns the ruling, it would allow for broader oversight of police conduct through the civil justice system. A government review into police accountability, commissioned by the Home Secretary and Lord Chancellor, is currently underway. The U.K. Parliament begins debating the amendment on Tuesday, October 13, 2026.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 2025

    Court of Appeal issues ruling expanding police immunity

  2. March 23, 2026

    U.S. Supreme Court reverses ruling on qualified immunity for Vermont officer

  3. October 10, 2026

    MPs Mitchell and Phillips submit amendment to counteract immunity ruling

  4. October 13, 2026

    U.K. Parliament scheduled to debate the proposed amendment

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: MPs Seek to Roll Back Police Immunity Ruling in England and Wales?

Legislative and judicial efforts to overturn a ruling that provides police with immunity from civil lawsuits regarding investigative failings.

Who is involved?

Andrew Mitchell (Conservative MP), Jess Phillips (Labour MP), U.K. Court of Appeal, U.S. Supreme Court, and victims of police negligence.

When did this happen?

October 2026

Where did this happen?

United Kingdom and United States

Why does this matter?

To address concerns that victims of crime are unable to seek legal redress when police fabricate evidence, act negligently, or disclose confidential information.