The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

Municipalities suspend license-plate surveillance cameras amid privacy concerns

Local officials in Rhode Island, Nebraska, Texas, and Florida have deactivated Flock license-plate cameras following privacy concerns and reports of officer misuse.

Published August 17, 2026 at 9:11 PM EDT

The short answer

Local officials in Rhode Island, Nebraska, Texas, and Florida have deactivated Flock license-plate cameras following privacy concerns and reports of officer misuse. Local officials in at least four states have suspended or removed automated license-plate reading cameras this month following reports of system misuse and privacy concerns.

Municipalities suspend license-plate surveillance cameras amid privacy concerns

The Facts

Who
Local government officials, police departments, and Flock Safety
What
Suspension and removal of Flock automated license-plate reading cameras in multiple states.
When
August 2026
Where
Rhode Island, Nebraska, Texas, and Florida
Why
Public privacy concerns and reports that law enforcement officers misused the surveillance technology.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. August 1, 2021

    DeFlock begins tracking cities deactivating or banning license-plate readers

  2. August 2, 2026

    Report details allegations of misuse by 50 law enforcement officers

  3. August 3, 2026

    Narragansett, RI and Ord, NE councils vote to cancel Flock contracts

  4. August 3, 2026

    Burnet County Sheriff’s Office announces removal of all Flock cameras

  5. August 7, 2026

    Palm Bay, FL officials order suspension and investigation of camera system

  6. August 13, 2026

    Flock announces privacy updates and new audit requirements for police

Local officials in at least four states have suspended or removed automated license-plate reading cameras this month following reports of system misuse and privacy concerns. The technology, provided by Atlanta-based company Flock Safety, is designed to assist law enforcement in locating missing persons and criminal suspects. However, recent decisions to deactivate the systems in Rhode Island, Nebraska, Texas, and Florida follow reports that some officers allegedly used the surveillance network for unauthorized purposes.

The removals coincide with an August 2 report by The Washington Post stating that at least 50 law enforcement officers have been charged with or accused of misusing Flock cameras and other surveillance tools. Some allegations included officers using the systems to stalk individuals. In response to these concerns and reports of misuse, several municipal governments voted to terminate contracts or physically disconnect the equipment during the first three weeks of August.

In Narragansett, Rhode Island, and Ord, Nebraska, city councils voted on August 3 to cancel their Flock contracts, with Ord police acknowledging that the technology introduces complex privacy concerns. In Texas, officials in Hood County and Burnet County removed their cameras, citing public concern and, in Burnet’s case, reports of equipment vandalism. Meanwhile, Palm Bay, Florida, suspended its program on August 7 to investigate whether the cameras were properly permitted and installed.

For the average resident, these decisions result in a concrete change in daily surveillance. In communities like Hood County, officials stated that cameras were previously scanning and recording citizens as they traveled through the area; the removal of these devices means those daily movements are no longer being logged by this specific automated system. Conversely, police officials in Narragansett and Ord noted that losing these tools removes what they described as a valuable investigative asset, which may change how local departments track suspect vehicles in criminal cases.

These local actions have already prompted policy changes at the corporate level. Flock Safety announced it will reduce its default data retention period from 30 days down to seven days and will require all law enforcement customers to adopt "Audit Assistance" software by the end of the year to flag abnormal activity. While the company stated its technology helps solve more than one million crimes annually, the recent pushback sets a precedent for local governments to prioritize privacy regulations over surveillance capabilities. Further investigations into installation permits in Florida and ongoing evaluations by sheriff's offices in Texas will determine if or when these systems return to operation.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Municipalities suspend license-plate surveillance cameras amid privacy concerns?

Suspension and removal of Flock automated license-plate reading cameras in multiple states.

Who is involved?

Local government officials, police departments, and Flock Safety

When did this happen?

August 2026

Where did this happen?

Rhode Island, Nebraska, Texas, and Florida

Why does this matter?

Public privacy concerns and reports that law enforcement officers misused the surveillance technology.