The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

Navy reviews aircraft carrier design changes following President Trump's requests

The U.S. Navy is conducting an internal review of the Ford-class aircraft carrier design to consider moving the command tower and reverting to steam catapults.

Published August 16, 2026 at 10:58 PM EDT

The short answer

The U.S. Navy is conducting an internal review of the Ford-class aircraft carrier design to consider moving the command tower and reverting to steam catapults.

Navy reviews aircraft carrier design changes following President Trump's requests

The Facts

Who
The U.S. Navy and President Trump.
What
The U.S. Navy is reviewing potential design changes to Ford-class aircraft carriers, including moving the command tower and replacing electromagnetic catapults with steam systems.
When
The internal review was reported Sunday, following a presidential directive issued Thursday.
Where
Washington, D.C. and Newport News Shipbuilding, Virginia.
Why
The changes are being considered to address President Trump's aesthetic concerns and his preference for traditional steam-powered launch systems over newer electromagnetic technology.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. Invalid Date

    USS Gerald R. Ford captain describes benefits of current island placement

  2. August 13, 2026

    President Trump orders Navy to revert to steam catapult systems

  3. August 15, 2026

    Washington Post reports Navy review of carrier island redesign

  4. August 16, 2026

    Former official confirms review of island placement is underway

The U.S. Navy has initiated an internal review to consider relocating the command tower, or "island," on its newest class of aircraft carriers following aesthetic concerns raised by President Trump. A former senior U.S. official familiar with the matter stated Sunday that the review is exploring moving the multistory tower from its current position toward the middle of the vessel to more closely resemble the design of older warships.

The island serves as the operational hub for flight-deck management, tactical command, and navigation. On current Ford-class carriers, the island is positioned further back on the starboard side, a design choice intended to maximize space for aircraft to line up before takeoff. The Navy is expected to conclude its internal review and provide a report within several weeks.

This design review follows a separate directive issued Thursday in which President Trump ordered the Navy to replace electromagnetic catapult systems with traditional steam-powered systems. That memo specifically targeted Ford-class ships currently under construction, such as the USS Doris Miller. Defense experts and officials have stated that reverting to steam catapults and hydraulic systems would cost billions of dollars and could reduce the operational efficiency of the vessels.

The scale of the fiscal impact is noted by experts as reaching into the billions of dollars for the catapult transition alone. While a specific dollar amount for moving the island has not been reported, any structural change to a $22 billion ship involves significant taxpayer funds. In day-to-day operations, pilots and deck crews would see a change in the "sortie generation rate," or how quickly planes can be launched and recovered. Former Navy officials, including Hunter Stires and Capt. Paul Lanzilotta, noted that the current Ford-class design was specifically engineered to increase this rate by providing more deck space in front of the island for aircraft troubleshooting and taxiing.

The knock-on effects extend to the construction timelines for the USS Enterprise and USS Doris Miller, which are already in progress. Altering the design mid-construction sets a precedent for White House involvement in technical naval architecture based on aesthetic preferences rather than strictly operational requirements. If the Navy adopts these changes, it would mark a departure from the technological shift toward the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and Advanced Weapons Elevators that characterized the Ford class. The Navy’s internal review is expected in several weeks, which will determine if the island relocation proceeds.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Navy reviews aircraft carrier design changes following President Trump's requests?

The U.S. Navy is reviewing potential design changes to Ford-class aircraft carriers, including moving the command tower and replacing electromagnetic catapults with steam systems.

Who is involved?

The U.S. Navy and President Trump.

When did this happen?

The internal review was reported Sunday, following a presidential directive issued Thursday.

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C. and Newport News Shipbuilding, Virginia.

Why does this matter?

The changes are being considered to address President Trump's aesthetic concerns and his preference for traditional steam-powered launch systems over newer electromagnetic technology.