Wednesday, July 29, 2026

The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

New York Times challenges DOJ subpoenas in Air Force One reporting case

The New York Times will ask a federal judge on Thursday to quash subpoenas issued to reporters following stories about the security of the new Air Force One.

Sourced from NPR
Published July 23, 2026 at 10:30 PM EDT
New York Times challenges DOJ subpoenas in Air Force One reporting case

The Facts

Who
The New York Times, the Department of Justice, and the FBI.
What
Federal court hearing regarding subpoenas issued to New York Times reporters.
When
Thursday, July 23, 2026
Where
New York City, New York
Why
The DOJ is investigating a potential national security breach while the Times claims the subpoenas interfere with First Amendment protections.

The New York Times is scheduled to appear in federal court on Thursday to challenge subpoenas issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to five of its reporters. The legal dispute follows news reports published by the Times regarding security concerns and technical specifications of a new Air Force One aircraft gifted to the U.S. government by Qatar. The newspaper's legal team, led by David A. O'Neil, argued in court filings that the subpoenas represent an attempt to bypass First Amendment protections and identify confidential sources.

The Justice Department stated that the subpoenas were issued in compliance with federal law to investigate a potential national security breach. U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton testified before the Senate that the department followed internal policies intended to minimize intrusion into newsgathering activities. However, the Times alleged that FBI agents visited reporters' homes to deliver the subpoenas and sought phone records for the journalists and several of their family members without prior notification.

Court filings by the Times also alleged that FBI Director Kash Patel personally oversaw the investigation from the White House. The newspaper argued this involvement suggests the investigation was motivated by administrative dissatisfaction with the reporting. The DOJ maintains that its actions are focused strictly on the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. U.S. District Court Judge Arun Subramanian will preside over the hearing to determine whether the subpoenas should be quashed.

This story was rewritten from reporting at NPR. Read the original for full detail.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page