The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

President Trump Faces Legal Setbacks in Efforts to Modify Election Procedures

President Trump has faced over 20 court losses in efforts to obtain voter data while considering a national emergency to implement election changes before midterms.

Published August 17, 2026 at 11:11 AM EDT

The short answer

President Trump has faced over 20 court losses in efforts to obtain voter data while considering a national emergency to implement election changes before midterms.

President Trump Faces Legal Setbacks in Efforts to Modify Election Procedures

The Facts

Who
President Donald Trump, the Department of Justice, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, and state attorneys general.
What
President Trump's efforts to modify federal election procedures through executive orders, DOJ lawsuits, and potential emergency declarations.
When
August 2026, leading up to the midterm elections.
Where
United States, with specific legal actions in Pennsylvania and Georgia.
Why
To report on the administration's attempts to centralize election administration and the subsequent legal challenges from courts and state officials.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. January 11, 2026

    President discusses 2020 voting machines in NYT interview

  2. August 17, 2026

    Administration continues pursuit of voter records following 21 court losses

President Donald Trump has encountered several legal and legislative obstacles in his efforts to change federal election administration as midterm elections approach. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has lost 21 consecutive court cases seeking to obtain state voter records, and federal courts have blocked executive orders aimed at restricting mail-in ballots and establishing national voter ID requirements. Additionally, the SAVE America Act has not gained sufficient support in Congress.

The administration has argued these actions are necessary to ensure states comply with federal laws requiring accurate voter registration lists. However, dozens of election officials and nearly two dozen state attorneys general have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to reject these changes. They state that implementing major ballot access restrictions shortly before an election would cause significant disruption and could disenfranchise voters who rely on mail-in ballots.

In a recent interview with Real America’s Voice, President Trump did not rule out declaring a national security emergency to unilaterally implement changes like voter ID requirements without congressional approval. When asked about the possibility, the president stated, "stranger things have happened." Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security Committee responded by calling the proposal "illegal and unconstitutional."

The administration also recently removed the three remaining members of the Election Assistance Commission, an independent agency that supports election workers. This move occurred as a Brennan Center for Justice poll reported that 38 percent of election workers have experienced harassment, and more than half fear for their safety. In a separate legal matter, a federal judge recently blocked a DOJ subpoena seeking the personal information of thousands of election workers in Fulton County, Georgia.

For the individual voter, these developments mean that rules regarding registration, identification, and ballot submission could change abruptly before the November midterm elections. A person might notice changes in their ability to request a mail-in ballot or find that they are no longer on the registration rolls due to the "mass purges" the DOJ is reportedly pursuing. Additionally, the deployment of federal law enforcement or troops to polling places—an option the president has not dismissed—would change the physical environment of voting centers and could lead to delays in ballot collection and tallying.

The displacement of officials at the Election Assistance Commission and cuts to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency could reduce the technical support and security resources available to local election offices. This sets a precedent for increased federal oversight of state-run processes, which typically operate under state constitutional authority. The next critical steps involve the Supreme Court's potential response to the administration's appeals regarding mail-in voting and whether the president follows through on a national emergency declaration before the November election date.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: President Trump Faces Legal Setbacks in Efforts to Modify Election Procedures?

President Trump's efforts to modify federal election procedures through executive orders, DOJ lawsuits, and potential emergency declarations.

Who is involved?

President Donald Trump, the Department of Justice, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, and state attorneys general.

When did this happen?

August 2026, leading up to the midterm elections.

Where did this happen?

United States, with specific legal actions in Pennsylvania and Georgia.

Why does this matter?

To report on the administration's attempts to centralize election administration and the subsequent legal challenges from courts and state officials.