Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Tuesday. Massie, who read the articles from the House floor, alleged that Hegseth has waged an illegal war in Iran and committed "high crimes and misdemeanors."
The filing follows a period of friction between Massie and the Trump administration. Massie previously partnered with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) to compel the administration to release files concerning Jeffrey Epstein and lost his recent primary election to an opponent supported by President Trump.
Massie’s resolution alleges that Hegseth initiated the six-month-old conflict unlawfully and defied a congressional order to withdraw. The articles further claim the Secretary is responsible for unnecessary civilian casualties. In response, Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson issued a statement describing Hegseth as a "transformative leader" and stating that the Department of Defense remains unified behind his vision.
The administration has stated the conflict is necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. However, the source reports that experts maintain Iran was not close to developing such a weapon when the conflict began six months ago. While Republicans hold a majority that could defeat the proposal, the source indicates the vote may be complicated for members representing competitive districts due to the war's reported lack of public support.
The scale of the conflict's impact is tied to the broader U.S. economy and the federal budget, which funds the Department of Defense. While the source does not provide a specific dollar amount for the war's cost or the exact number of civilian casualties alleged, the proceedings could set a precedent for how Congress exerts its War Powers over a sitting Secretary of Defense. If the resolution moves forward, it would represent a formal challenge to the administration’s stated objective of nuclear non-proliferation in the region.
The House of Representatives is required to act on Massie's proposal by Thursday, as the chamber is scheduled to begin an extended recess at the end of this week. That recess will continue until after the midterm elections in November. It is not yet known if the House leadership will schedule a floor vote or refer the articles to the Judiciary Committee for further review before the Thursday deadline.
