The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

SCOTUSblog Provides Update on Supreme Court Forecasting Contest Comparing Human and AI Predictions

SCOTUSblog and Good Judgment Inc. are hosting a contest for the 2026-27 term to compare human legal predictions against artificial intelligence.

Background: How the Supreme Court takes a case

Published November 2, 2026 at 9:30 AM EST

The short answer

SCOTUSblog and Good Judgment Inc. are hosting a contest for the 2026-27 term to compare human legal predictions against artificial intelligence. SCOTUSblog announced on Monday, November 2, 2026, an update on its inaugural Supreme Court forecasting contest for the 2026-27 term.

SCOTUSblog Provides Update on Supreme Court Forecasting Contest Comparing Human and AI Predictions

The Facts

Who
SCOTUSblog and Good Judgment Inc.
What
Supreme Court forecasting contest update
When
Monday, November 2, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
To test the accuracy of collective human judgment against AI in predicting Supreme Court case outcomes.

SCOTUSblog announced on Monday, November 2, 2026, an update on its inaugural Supreme Court forecasting contest for the 2026-27 term. The project, conducted in collaboration with Good Judgment Inc., allows participants to submit predictions on how the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in specific cases and compares those human forecasts against artificial intelligence models.

The contest follows a historical precedent of similar studies. A 2002 project at Washington University in St. Louis compared the accuracy of legal experts against a statistical forecasting model for every argued case that term, with findings later published in the Columbia Law Review in 2004. The current SCOTUSblog initiative incorporates public participation and AI tools, which a September 2026 presidential action referred to as "Super Intelligence."

For the October session, the contest tracked three cases already argued before the Court: Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, Johnson v. United States Congress, and Beaird v. United States. The cases addressed legal questions ranging from federal preemption of state-law tort claims to the jurisdiction of district courts over disability benefit claims and the level of deference owed to Federal Sentencing Guidelines commentary.

A person participating in the challenge can update their forecasts until the moment a case is decided. The results could provide data for legal scholars and political scientists studying the predictability of the federal judiciary, similar to how the 2002 study compared retrospective versus prospective legal frameworks.

Two cases were added for the current session: St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, which is scheduled for oral argument on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, and Nielsen v. Watanabe, scheduled for Monday, November 9, 2026. Participants can sign up for the challenge using an email address or social media account. SCOTUSblog stated it will continue to add significant cases to the forecasting page as the Court grants them for review throughout the term. Final results and the comparison between human and AI accuracy are expected to be released in July 2027.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. October 1, 2002

    Historical forecasting study begins

    Study comparing legal experts and statistical models began for the Court's 2002 term.

  2. May 1, 2004

    2002 study results published

    The results of the 2002 forecasting study were published in the Columbia Law Review.

  3. September 1, 2026

    White House action on AI

    Presidential action concerning the era of 'Super Intelligence.'

  4. October 5, 2026

    October oral arguments begin

    Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder County and Johnson v. U.S. Congress were argued.

  5. November 2, 2026

    Contest update announced

    SCOTUSblog updates the contest as the second session of arguments begins.

  6. November 3, 2026

    St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy oral argument

  7. November 9, 2026

    Nielsen v. Watanabe oral argument

  8. July 1, 2027

    Expected contest conclusion

    Top forecasters will be named and compared to machine results.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: SCOTUSblog Provides Update on Supreme Court Forecasting Contest Comparing Human and AI Predictions?

SCOTUSblog announced on Monday, November 2, 2026, an update on its inaugural Supreme Court forecasting contest for the 2026-27 term. The project, conducted in collaboration with Good Judgment Inc., allows participants to submit predictions on how the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in specific cases and compares those human forecasts against artificial intelligence models.

Who is involved?

SCOTUSblog and Good Judgment Inc.

When did this happen?

Monday, November 2, 2026

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C.

Why does this matter?

To test the accuracy of collective human judgment against AI in predicting Supreme Court case outcomes.