The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

South Korea Demands Apology from Ukraine Over Disclosure of North Korean Prisoners

South Korea summoned Ukraine's ambassador after President Zelenskyy disclosed the transfer of two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul.

Published September 28, 2026 at 2:29 AM EDT

The short answer

South Korea summoned Ukraine's ambassador after President Zelenskyy disclosed the transfer of two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul. South Korea has called for an official apology from Ukraine after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed what Seoul described as a secret transfer of two North Korean prisoners of war.

South Korea Demands Apology from Ukraine Over Disclosure of North Korean Prisoners

The Facts

Who
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and presidential adviser Seong Ghi-hong; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ambassador Andrii Vieshkin.
What
South Korea demanded an apology from Ukraine for disclosing a secret transfer of North Korean prisoners of war.
When
Monday, Sept. 28, 2026
Where
Seoul, South Korea
Why
South Korea claims the disclosure violated a secret agreement intended to protect the prisoners' families and avoid diplomatic backlash from North Korea.

South Korea has called for an official apology from Ukraine after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed what Seoul described as a secret transfer of two North Korean prisoners of war. The South Korean government reported on Monday, Sept. 28, 2026, that it had summoned Ukraine’s ambassador to protest the disclosure, which it claimed violated a nondisclosure agreement. Ukraine has denied that such an agreement existed.

The tension follows Zelenskyy’s address to the U.N. General Assembly last week, during which he stated that Ukraine had sent two captured North Korean soldiers to South Korea. The men were taken prisoner on a Ukraine-Russia battlefield in early 2025. While South Korea has a policy of accepting North Korean defectors, the administration of President Lee Jae Myung sought to keep this specific transfer confidential to protect the safety of the soldiers' relatives and avoid diplomatic friction with North Korea.

Seong Ghi-hong, a senior presidential adviser for public relations, expressed "strong regret" on Sunday, Sept. 27, and stated that Ukraine’s denial of the agreement undermined trust between the two nations. According to Seong, Ukraine entered the agreement to avoid domestic criticism for not using the North Koreans in a prisoner exchange for Ukrainian soldiers held by Russia. The South Korean Foreign Ministry confirmed it met with Ambassador Andrii Vieshkin on Monday to deliver the protest.

This diplomatic dispute affects North Korean soldiers currently involved in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and their families in North Korea. According to South Korean intelligence estimates from last year, North Korea has sent approximately 15,000 troops to support Russia, with roughly 2,000 reported killed. The disclosure of defecting soldiers is rare; while over 34,000 North Koreans have fled to the South since 1953, most are civilians. For the individual soldiers, public identification increases the risk of retaliation against their families by the North Korean government, while for the South Korean government, it complicates efforts to resume diplomacy between Pyongyang and Washington.

For the South Korean public, this event highlights the legal and financial commitment the state makes to North Korean defectors, who are legally regarded as citizens under South Korean law and receive government resettlement support. The scale of the military involvement mentioned involves thousands of North Korean troops and transfers of artillery and missiles to Russia. A person in South Korea would notice this as a potential shift in regional security, as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un leverages this cooperation to accelerate his nuclear weapons program despite international sanctions. The incident sets a precedent for how future North Korean prisoners of war captured in Ukraine will be handled and whether they will be resettled.

What happens next depends on the official response from Kyiv. Ambassador Vieshkin stated on Monday, Sept. 28, that he would convey Seoul’s demand for an apology to his government. No specific deadline for a response was reported. The outcome may influence whether South Korea maintains its policy of providing only humanitarian aid to Ukraine or yields to pressure to provide direct military support, a step it has so far avoided to remain in compliance with policies against supplying weapons to active conflict zones.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. February 24, 2022

    Russia invades Ukraine; South Korea joins economic sanctions

  2. January 1, 2025

    Two North Korean soldiers captured on Ukraine-Russia battlefield

  3. April 1, 2025

    North Korea and Russia confirm joint military operations in Kursk

  4. August 1, 2026

    U.S. President Trump scales back military drills with South Korea

  5. September 23, 2026

    Zelenskyy tells U.N. General Assembly of prisoner transfer

  6. September 27, 2026

    South Korean presidential adviser demands apology and explanation

  7. September 28, 2026

    South Korean Foreign Ministry summons Ukrainian ambassador

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: South Korea Demands Apology from Ukraine Over Disclosure of North Korean Prisoners?

South Korea demanded an apology from Ukraine for disclosing a secret transfer of North Korean prisoners of war.

Who is involved?

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and presidential adviser Seong Ghi-hong; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ambassador Andrii Vieshkin.

When did this happen?

Monday, Sept. 28, 2026

Where did this happen?

Seoul, South Korea

Why does this matter?

South Korea claims the disclosure violated a secret agreement intended to protect the prisoners' families and avoid diplomatic backlash from North Korea.