The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds $122,000 in Legal Fees for Kari Lake’s Attorneys

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a $122,000 sanction against lawyers for Kari Lake over a 2022 lawsuit seeking to ban electronic voting machines.

Background: How the Supreme Court takes a case

Published October 13, 2026 at 5:12 PM EDT

The short answer

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a $122,000 sanction against lawyers for Kari Lake over a 2022 lawsuit seeking to ban electronic voting machines.

Supreme Court Upholds $122,000 in Legal Fees for Kari Lake’s Attorneys

The Facts

Who
The U.S. Supreme Court, attorney Andrew D. Parker, former candidate Kari Lake, and Maricopa County.
What
The U.S. Supreme Court refused to throw out $122,000 in legal costs that lawyers for Kari Lake were ordered to pay for statements made in a 2022 lawsuit.
When
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C. and Phoenix, Arizona
Why
The court let stand sanctions issued against lawyers for making what a judge described as false and misleading statements regarding Arizona's voting systems.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, declined to review a lower-court ruling that ordered lawyers for former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake to pay $122,000 in legal fees. The fees were assessed as sanctions for what a judge described as false and misleading statements made in a 2022 lawsuit seeking a hand count of midterm election ballots.

The underlying litigation, filed by Lake and state lawmaker Mark Finchem, sought to prohibit the use of electronic tabulation devices in Arizona elections. U.S. District Judge John Tuchi dismissed the case in 2022, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing and that the suit was filed too close to the election. Maricopa County subsequently requested sanctions, alleging the legal team filed unfounded claims without proper research.

Judge Tuchi ruled that the lawsuit's claims lacked an adequate factual basis and that the attorneys acted recklessly. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals later upheld both the dismissal of the lawsuit and the sanctions. Andrew D. Parker, a Minneapolis-based attorney for Lake, petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the costs, arguing that such penalties could discourage lawyers from pursuing novel legal theories.

For Maricopa County, the $122,000 represents a reimbursement for legal costs incurred while defending against the litigation. In a broader sense, the Supreme Court's refusal to intervene maintains a precedent for the use of court rules to penalize attorneys who present what judges deem to be frivolous or insufficiently researched claims. Legal professionals may notice a stricter enforcement of inquiry standards before filing election-related challenges in federal court.

The decision brings a conclusion to the specific dispute over these sanctions. The payment is owed to Maricopa County following the exhaustion of the appeals process. While the Supreme Court's order on Tuesday ends this request for review, it does not change the results of the 2022 elections in which Lake and Finchem were defeated by Democrats Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes, respectively.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 2022

    Lawsuit dismissed by U.S. District Judge

    Judge Tuchi dismisses the suit for lack of standing and proximity to the election.

  2. 2026

    Attorney appeals to Supreme Court

    Andrew D. Parker petitions the Supreme Court to review the sanctions.

  3. October 13, 2026

    Supreme Court denies review of sanctions

    The nation's highest court denies the request to review the lower-court decision.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Supreme Court Upholds $122,000 in Legal Fees for Kari Lake’s Attorneys?

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to throw out $122,000 in legal costs that lawyers for Kari Lake were ordered to pay for statements made in a 2022 lawsuit.

Who is involved?

The U.S. Supreme Court, attorney Andrew D. Parker, former candidate Kari Lake, and Maricopa County.

When did this happen?

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C. and Phoenix, Arizona

Why does this matter?

The court let stand sanctions issued against lawyers for making what a judge described as false and misleading statements regarding Arizona's voting systems.