The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Texas Court Hears Surrogacy Custody Dispute Over Medical Diagnosis and Abortion Refusal

A Texas court is weighing a custody battle between biological parents and a surrogate who refused a requested abortion following a medical diagnosis for the fetus.

Published August 26, 2026 at 6:35 PM EDT

The short answer

A Texas court is weighing a custody battle between biological parents and a surrogate who refused a requested abortion following a medical diagnosis for the fetus.

Texas Court Hears Surrogacy Custody Dispute Over Medical Diagnosis and Abortion Refusal

The Facts

Who
Biological parents Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, surrogate McKenna West, and reporter Shefali Luthra.
What
A legal dispute between biological parents and a surrogate over the custody of a baby born with a heart condition.
When
The week of August 24, 2026.
Where
A court in Texas.
Why
The surrogate refused a requested abortion after a medical diagnosis and is now seeking custody in Texas, a case that activists hope will lead to surrogacy restrictions.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. June 1, 2026

    California court rules biological parents have legal custody

  2. August 25, 2026

    Texas court holds hearing on custody dispute and medical decisions

A Texas court heard arguments the week of August 24, 2026, in a custody dispute between a California couple and their surrogate over an infant born with a serious heart condition. The biological parents, Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, are seeking to maintain their parental rights, while the surrogate, McKenna West, is petitioning to gain custody of the child.

The dispute began during the pregnancy when the fetus was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). According to the parents, West initially agreed to their request for an abortion but later changed her mind and cut off contact. West, a nurse from Alaska, testified that she subsequently relocated to Texas with the assistance of an anti-abortion group that is covering her legal fees.

During a court hearing, West's attorneys argued that the biological parents should not be permitted to make medical decisions for the child because they had previously sought a termination of the pregnancy. Gilkar and Ahmed testified that they had undergone eight rounds of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and a hysterectomy in their efforts to conceive, stating they intend to do whatever they can to keep the child alive. The baby has already undergone surgery in Texas.

A California court previously ruled in June 2026 that Gilkar and Ahmed are the legal parents, but the current proceedings in Texas involve a petition by West to gain custody. The Texas Attorney General's office is also involved in the case.

The case has drawn the attention of groups seeking to enact new restrictions on fertility treatments. According to Shefali Luthra of The 19th News, some advocates hope the case will help provide ammunition to get a ban on surrogacy enacted in Texas as early as next year. Luthra noted that the arguments used in this case, such as concerns regarding the "naturalness" of conception, could eventually be applied to other reproductive technologies like IVF. The Texas court has not yet issued a final ruling on the custody petition.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Texas Court Hears Surrogacy Custody Dispute Over Medical Diagnosis and Abortion Refusal?

A legal dispute between biological parents and a surrogate over the custody of a baby born with a heart condition.

Who is involved?

Biological parents Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, surrogate McKenna West, and reporter Shefali Luthra.

When did this happen?

The week of August 24, 2026.

Where did this happen?

A court in Texas.

Why does this matter?

The surrogate refused a requested abortion after a medical diagnosis and is now seeking custody in Texas, a case that activists hope will lead to surrogacy restrictions.