The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Texas Judge Rules TikTok Violated Consumer Protection Law Over Child Safety Features

Judge Cory Liu ruled that TikTok violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by misleading users about its content filtering and 'Restricted Mode' features.

Published September 10, 2026 at 10:12 PM EDT

The short answer

Judge Cory Liu ruled that TikTok violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by misleading users about its content filtering and 'Restricted Mode' features. A Texas judge ruled on Thursday, September 10, 2026, that TikTok violated state consumer protection law by misleading users about its content filtration for minors.

Texas Judge Rules TikTok Violated Consumer Protection Law Over Child Safety Features

The Facts

Who
Judge Cory Liu, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and TikTok
What
A judge ruled that TikTok violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by misleading users about how its Restricted Mode and content filters worked for children.
When
Thursday, September 10, 2026
Where
Texas
Why
The state argued that TikTok marketed itself as safe for children while internally allowing content it promised to remove, and that its filtering tools did not work as advertised.

A Texas judge ruled on Thursday, September 10, 2026, that TikTok violated state consumer protection law by misleading users about its content filtration for minors. The ruling determined that the social media platform misrepresented the effectiveness of its "Restricted Mode" and its general safety standards for children.

Texas initially filed the lawsuit in January 2025, alleging that the company marketed its platform as safe for children. According to the ruling, Judge Cory Liu found that TikTok told users it would remove content violating Community Guidelines, such as material involving drugs, gambling, or graphic injuries. However, the state argued that internal records showed the company classified some of this material as "hard to find" rather than "do not allow," which permitted the content to remain on the service. Judge Liu stated that Texas established that "Restricted Mode" exposed minors to content the company claimed would be filtered out.

The case will now proceed to a trial to determine specific penalties and remedies for the consumer protection violations. The office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton stated that the trial is expected to be scheduled next month, in October 2026. In August 2026, Meta agreed to pay up to $18 billion to settle claims regarding social media addiction, and TikTok itself agreed to settle three other U.S. lawsuits involving teen mental health. TikTok did not immediately respond to requests for comment following the Thursday ruling.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. January 2025

    Texas files lawsuit against TikTok

  2. August 3, 2026

    TikTok settles three U.S. lawsuits regarding teen mental health

  3. August 26, 2026

    Meta reaches $18 billion settlement over addiction claims

  4. September 10, 2026

    Judge Cory Liu grants partial summary judgment against TikTok

  5. October 2026

    Expected scheduling of trial for penalties and remedies

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Texas Judge Rules TikTok Violated Consumer Protection Law Over Child Safety Features?

A judge ruled that TikTok violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by misleading users about how its Restricted Mode and content filters worked for children.

Who is involved?

Judge Cory Liu, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and TikTok

When did this happen?

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Where did this happen?

Texas

Why does this matter?

The state argued that TikTok marketed itself as safe for children while internally allowing content it promised to remove, and that its filtering tools did not work as advertised.