Friday, July 31, 2026

The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Education

Three Programmatic Accreditors Voluntarily Withdraw From Federal Recognition

Three organizations that certify specialized college programs have opted out of the federal recognition process, following a disagreement over new government standards.

Sourced from Inside Higher Ed
Published July 30, 2026 at 8:00 PM EDT
Three Programmatic Accreditors Voluntarily Withdraw From Federal Recognition

The Facts

Who
The Midwifery Education Accreditation Council, the Council on Education for Public Health, the Council on Chiropractic Education, and Education Under Secretary Nicholas Kent.
What
Three programmatic accrediting agencies withdrew their petitions for federal recognition.
When
July 2026
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
The agencies cited unpredictable federal standards and a desire to control their own timelines, while the Department of Education attributed the move to an inability to meet new quality requirements.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. May 22, 2026

    Accreditation, Innovation and Modernization rulemaking concludes

  2. July 24, 2026

    Education Under Secretary announces withdrawals at advisory meeting

Three programmatic accrediting agencies have voluntarily withdrawn their petitions for federal recognition, according to an announcement by Education Under Secretary Nicholas Kent. The agencies include the Midwifery Education Accreditation Council (MEAC), the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH), and the Council on Chiropractic Education (CCE). The announcement was made during a meeting of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI), which advises the Department of Education on accreditation matters.

The withdrawals occur amid a broader overhaul of the federal accreditation system. Recent regulations introduced by the Trump administration have sought more stringent requirements for student outcomes and changes to the composition of accreditor boards, moving away from a traditional peer-review model. Federally recognized accreditors serve as "gatekeepers," determining whether the institutions they oversee are eligible to receive federal student aid.

Under Secretary Kent stated that the agencies withdrew to "avoid" new regulations and claimed the groups were "unwilling or unable" to meet higher standards. However, representatives from the accrediting bodies disputed this characterization. Laura Rasar King, executive director of CEPH, stated that the decision followed two years of analysis and noted that the recognition process has become increasingly political across multiple administrations.

MEAC issued a statement explaining that their decision was prompted by "shifting federal priorities" that made the timeline and standards difficult to predict. The council noted that withdrawing allows them to reapply in the future on their own timeline. Public health and chiropractic officials noted that many programmatic accreditors operate without federal recognition, often relying instead on private recognition from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.

The shift signals a changing relationship between the federal government and professional education standards. For small-business owners in these fields and students pursuing these degrees, the "gatekeeper" status of an accreditor determines whether a school can accept Pell Grants or federal student loans. If an agency is not recognized by the Department of Education, the schools it accredits must find an alternative path to federal aid eligibility or transition to a model where students pay through private means or out-of-pocket. The cost of maintaining federal recognition—involving thousands of hours of administrative labor and significant legal fees—has led some groups to conclude the benefit is no longer worth the expense.

The broader impact involves a potential precedent for "decoupling" professional standards from federal oversight. If more agencies withdraw, the Department of Education loses a direct mechanism for enforcing its specific outcome metrics on specialized programs like midwifery or public health. The next steps for these agencies involve internal reviews to determine if they will reapply for recognition under modified terms or remain independent of federal oversight. MEAC has indicated it plans to reapply at an unspecified future date, while CEPH and CCE have not set deadlines for a return to the federal recognition process.

This story was rewritten from reporting at Inside Higher Ed. Read the original for full detail.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page