The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Supreme Court

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions

The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to lift a judge's block on a March executive order that requires the U.S. Postal Service to tighten mail-in ballot rules.

Published August 12, 2026 at 12:24 PM EDT

The short answer

The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to lift a judge's block on a March executive order that requires the U.S. Postal Service to tighten mail-in ballot rules.

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions

The Facts

Who
The Trump administration, the U.S. Justice Department, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
What
The Trump administration filed an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to lift a nationwide injunction against an executive order that restricts mail-in voting by requiring the Postal Service to verify voter eligibility lists.
When
Wednesday, August 12, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C. and Boston, Massachusetts
Why
The administration seeks to enforce tighter mail-in voting rules ahead of the November midterm elections, while a district judge ruled the federal government lacks the constitutional authority to regulate state-run elections.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. March 2026

    President Trump signs executive order on mail-in ballots

  2. May 29, 2026

    U.s. Postal Service moves to implement voting directive

  3. June 2026

    Judge Talwani blocks order in 23 states and D.C.

  4. July 27, 2026

    Administration asks Supreme Court to pause June injunction

  5. August 11, 2026

    Judge Talwani expands injunction to nationwide block

  6. August 12, 2026

    Justice Department files emergency request with Supreme Court

The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to allow the full implementation of an executive order that tightens rules for mail-in ballots. The Justice Department filing seeks to put on hold a Tuesday ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, which blocked the U.S. Postal Service from nationwide enforcement of the administration's new voting directives.

The legal dispute centers on a March executive order signed by President Donald Trump following his past calls for mail-in voting restrictions. In June, Judge Talwani issued an initial injunction preventing the order's enforcement in Washington, D.C., and 23 states, most of which are led by Democrats. The Tuesday decision expanded that block to a nationwide scale.

The executive order directs the Department of Homeland Security to provide states with lists of eligible citizens and instructs the Justice Department to prioritize the prosecution of election officials who provide ballots to individuals deemed ineligible. Additionally, it requires the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters appearing on state-approved mail-in lists. The Postal Service recently began steps to implement these requirements.

The ruling by Judge Talwani affects the day-to-day operations of the U.S. Postal Service and state election offices. The judge stated that the federal executive branch lacks the authority to regulate elections, asserting that the U.S. Constitution leaves this responsibility to individual states. If the Supreme Court grants the administration's request, the federal government could proceed with directing the Postal Service to cross-reference voter lists, potentially altering how ballots are distributed in the upcoming November midterm elections that will determine control of Congress.

The outcome sets a significant precedent regarding the balance of power between the federal government and states in managing election logistics. A Supreme Court intervention would clarify whether the executive branch can use federal agencies like the Postal Service and Homeland Security to enforce specific eligibility standards. As of Wednesday, the Supreme Court is weighing the administration's request to lift the injunctions. The schedule for a final ruling has not been reported, but the administration is seeking immediate action ahead of the November elections.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions?

The Trump administration filed an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to lift a nationwide injunction against an executive order that restricts mail-in voting by requiring the Postal Service to verify voter eligibility lists.

Who is involved?

The Trump administration, the U.S. Justice Department, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

When did this happen?

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C. and Boston, Massachusetts

Why does this matter?

The administration seeks to enforce tighter mail-in voting rules ahead of the November midterm elections, while a district judge ruled the federal government lacks the constitutional authority to regulate state-run elections.