The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

On the Hill

Trump Administration Moves to Cancel Almost $1 Billion in Appropriated Spending

President Trump moved to cancel almost $1 billion in approved spending for refugee services and education using a 'pocket rescission' maneuver that critics call illegal.

Background: The power of the purse, explained: appropriations, impoundment and who controls federal spending

By The Plain RecordUpdated September 26, 2026 at 12:35 AM EDT
Published September 26, 2026 at 12:35 AM EDT

The short answer

President Trump moved to cancel almost $1 billion in approved spending for refugee services and education using a 'pocket rescission' maneuver that critics call illegal.

Updates (1)

  • Update — September 26, 2026 at 12:35 AM EDT: Many lawmakers, including some top Republicans, say the tactic is illegal.
Trump Administration Moves to Cancel Almost $1 Billion in Appropriated Spending

The Facts

Who
President Donald Trump, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), and the Office of Management and Budget.
What
The move to cancel almost $1 billion in federal spending through a pocket rescission.
When
Friday, September 25, late in the fiscal year ending September 30.
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
The administration aims to cut spending it deems wasteful, while lawmakers argue the move illegally bypasses congressional authority.

President Donald Trump notified congressional leaders on Friday that his administration is moving to cancel almost $1 billion in spending previously approved by Congress. The White House identified $567 million in Department of Health and Human Services funds for refugee, asylee, and migrant services; $50 million for other immigrant aid programs; $70 million in international education grants; and $56 million for Housing and Urban Development programs among the targets. The administration stated the move is intended to eliminate wasteful spending that does not benefit U.S. citizens.

The maneuver, known as a "pocket rescission," involves the president submitting a request to claw back funds shortly before the end of the fiscal year. Under the Impoundment Control Act, a president can propose rescinding funds, which triggers a 45-day period during which the money is withheld while Congress considers the request. Because the current fiscal year ends on Wednesday, the administration argues that the funds will expire before the 45-day window concludes, effectively canceling them without a vote from lawmakers.

Lawmakers from both parties, including Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), have characterized the action as illegal. Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, stated that the Office of Management and Budget intentionally withheld the funds for months to execute the cancellation. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) also criticized the move, with Murray calling it an "end run around Congress." The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has previously issued an opinion stating that the Impoundment Control Act does not permit the president to unilaterally shorten the availability of funds by transmitting proposals shortly before they expire.

For the organizations and schools that rely on these federal grants, the move means that funds previously signed into law will not be distributed. The GAO has noted that such maneuvers could effectively allow the executive branch to override the "power of the purse" granted to Congress under Article I of the Constitution. The administration maintains the authority to manage federal spending and prioritize programs that align with its policy objectives.

What happens next: The current fiscal year ends on Wednesday, September 30. Unless legal intervention occurs before the funds expire, the money will remain withheld and eventually lapse. Congressional leaders have expressed concern that this standoff could complicate negotiations to avoid a government shutdown, as the deadline for funding the government for fiscal year 2026 also falls on September 30. The Supreme Court has previously addressed a similar rescission regarding foreign aid but did not reach a final decision on the merits of the pocket rescission tactic.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. 1977

    Last pocket rescission prior to Trump administration occurs during Carter era

  2. 2018

    GAO finds pocket rescissions lack legal basis to unilaterally shorten funding availability

  3. August 29, 2025

    Administration requests $4.9 billion rescission of USAID funding

  4. September 25, 2026

    White House notifies Congress of nearly $1 billion in new spending cancellations

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Trump Administration Moves to Cancel Almost $1 Billion in Appropriated Spending?

The move to cancel almost $1 billion in federal spending through a pocket rescission.

Who is involved?

President Donald Trump, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), and the Office of Management and Budget.

When did this happen?

Friday, September 25, late in the fiscal year ending September 30.

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C.

Why does this matter?

The administration aims to cut spending it deems wasteful, while lawmakers argue the move illegally bypasses congressional authority.