The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Trump Petitions Supreme Court to Overturn $83.3 Million Carroll Verdict

President Donald Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn an $83.3 million defamation verdict, citing presidential immunity for statements made in 2019.

By The Plain Record, sourced from Reuters
Published July 28, 2026 at 7:27 PM EDT
Trump Petitions Supreme Court to Overturn $83.3 Million Carroll Verdict

The Facts

Who
Donald Trump, E. Jean Carroll, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the U.S. Justice Department.
What
President Donald Trump filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn an $83.3 million defamation verdict in favor of E. Jean Carroll.
When
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Where
Washington, D.C. and New York City
Why
Trump argues that he has presidential immunity for statements made while in office and that the lower courts wrongly decided he had forfeited that defense.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. Invalid Date

    Carroll alleges rape; Trump denies claim and Carroll sues for defamation

  2. Invalid Date

    Trump makes social media statements; second lawsuit filed

  3. Invalid Date

    Jury awards Carroll $5 million for sexual abuse and defamation

  4. January 26, 2024

    Jury awards Carroll $83.3 million in first defamation case

  5. July 1, 2024

    Supreme Court rules on presidential immunity in criminal cases

  6. Invalid Date

    2nd Circuit rejects immunity claim in Carroll civil case

  7. May 28, 2026

    DOJ launches criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll for alleged perjury

  8. June 29, 2026

    Supreme Court declines to hear appeal of $5 million verdict

  9. July 28, 2026

    Trump files Supreme Court appeal for $83.3 million verdict

President Donald Trump filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, seeking to overturn an $83.3 million defamation verdict awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll. The verdict stems from statements Trump made in 2019 while serving as president, in which he denied Carroll's allegations that he had raped her in a department store dressing room during the 1990s.

The filing challenges a previous ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld the judgment. Trump’s legal team argues that the lower court failed to address whether he is protected by presidential immunity for comments made while in office. Additionally, the Justice Department filed a separate appeal, arguing that federal law should allow the U.S. government to replace Trump as the defendant in the case.

Lower courts previously determined that Trump had forfeited his right to claim presidential immunity because he did not raise the defense early enough in the litigation. Trump's lawyers characterized this as a "procedural contortion," stating that the comments were official acts because they addressed public concerns regarding his fitness for office. Carroll previously won a separate $5 million verdict against Trump for 2022 statements, a judgment the Supreme Court declined to review in June 2026.

The financial scale of the case involves an $83.3 million judgment, which is currently owed by Donald Trump to E. Jean Carroll. For Carroll, a former magazine columnist, the outcome determines whether she will receive this payment or if the verdict will be voided entirely. The Justice Department’s involvement also introduces the possibility of the U.S. government assuming the legal and financial burden of the defense, which would shift the case from a personal dispute to one involving federal resources and representation.

A decision by the Supreme Court will clarify the boundary between a president's private conduct and official duties. Beyond the civil liability, the outcome may influence a separate criminal investigation by the Justice Department into Carroll for alleged perjury, which was disclosed in May 2026. The Supreme Court has not yet set a date for oral arguments or a deadline for a ruling on this specific appeal.

This story was rewritten from reporting at Reuters. Read the original for full detail.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page