The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

U.S. Intelligence Sharing Slows Amid Agency Tensions and Staff Cuts

Current and former officials report that intelligence sharing on Iran and other threats has slowed due to agency friction and personnel cuts during the Trump administration's second term.

Background: The power of the purse, explained: appropriations, impoundment and who controls federal spending

Published November 3, 2026 at 6:05 AM EST

The short answer

Current and former officials report that intelligence sharing on Iran and other threats has slowed due to agency friction and personnel cuts during the Trump administration's second term.

U.S. Intelligence Sharing Slows Amid Agency Tensions and Staff Cuts

The Facts

Who
Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, Jay Clayton, CIA, and ODNI officials.
What
Disruptions in U.S. intelligence sharing and inter-agency cooperation.
When
During the second term of the Trump administration, through November 3, 2026.
Where
Washington, D.C.
Why
A combination of personnel cuts, turf wars between the CIA and ODNI, and accusations of leaks led to a slowdown in coordinated threat assessments.

Intelligence sharing regarding global threats like Iran has slowed or periodically ceased across the federal government and Congress during President Donald Trump's second term, according to eight current and former officials. The reports indicate that internal friction and personnel changes have disrupted the flow of information between major agencies, specifically the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Former officials and outside experts stated that these disruptions could prevent policymakers from receiving a comprehensive understanding of national security threats.

The reported slowdown coincided with significant staff cuts at the CIA and ODNI as the administration sought to remove officials perceived as disloyal. Tensions escalated during the tenure of former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who resigned in June 2026. According to two officials, the CIA ceased co-authoring assessments with the National Intelligence Council (NIC), the ODNI’s primary analytical group. While the CIA continues to share data, the NIC has reportedly slowed its production of consolidated reports, with none focusing on the war in Iran.

Lawmakers and their staff also experienced temporary halts in intelligence briefings following the U.S. military intervention in Iran in June 2025 and the capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026. Sources said Gabbard’s team accused lawmakers of leaking information to the press. Additionally, the FBI reportedly suspended intelligence sharing with the National Counterterrorism Center for several weeks in late 2025 after a dispute over an investigation into a shooting involving Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.

For members of Congress and their staff, the concrete change was the temporary loss of certain intelligence reports during high-stakes periods, such as the weeks following the 2025 Iran intervention. While Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, who took office in August 2026, has resumed some briefings—including those on election threats—the reduction of joint CIA-NIC reports persists. This shift forces policymakers to rely on individual agency "lily pads," according to former official Morgan Muir, rather than coordinated community-wide findings. This decentralized approach can lead to conflicting information reaching the White House and Capitol Hill, potentially impacting the timing and nature of military or diplomatic responses.

The knock-on effects include a reported environment where some analysts avoid writing assessments that conflict with White House views for fear of political retaliation. This cultural shift within the agencies could result in long-term changes to how intelligence is collected and presented to the U.S. government. To address these issues, former officials at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution have begun a bipartisan effort to develop plans for rebuilding the intelligence community’s infrastructure. The administration is currently considering whether to resume strikes on Iran following the midterm elections held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Further developments will depend on how the administration and DNI Clayton manage agency cooperation in the coming months.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. June 1, 2025

    U.S. military intervention in Iran

    Briefings to Congress were briefly halted following this event.

  2. June 2, 2025

    Reuters reports on feuds between top U.S. spy agencies

  3. January 1, 2026

    Capture of Nicolás Maduro

    Briefings to Congress were again briefly halted by the ODNI.

  4. June 1, 2026

    Tulsi Gabbard resigns as Director of National Intelligence

  5. August 1, 2026

    Jay Clayton becomes Director of National Intelligence

  6. November 3, 2026

    U.S. midterm elections held

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: U.S. Intelligence Sharing Slows Amid Agency Tensions and Staff Cuts?

Intelligence sharing regarding global threats like Iran has slowed or periodically ceased across the federal government and Congress during President Donald Trump's second term, according to eight current and former officials. The reports indicate that internal friction and personnel changes have disrupted the flow of information between major agencies, specifically the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).

Who is involved?

Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, Jay Clayton, CIA, and ODNI officials.

When did this happen?

During the second term of the Trump administration, through November 3, 2026.

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C.

Why does this matter?

A combination of personnel cuts, turf wars between the CIA and ODNI, and accusations of leaks led to a slowdown in coordinated threat assessments.