The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

U.S. Navy Reviews Aircraft Carrier Redesign Following Requests From President Trump

The U.S. Navy is reviewing whether to move the command tower on Ford-class carriers to the center of the ships following aesthetic concerns from the White House.

Published August 16, 2026 at 10:58 PM EDT

The short answer

The U.S. Navy is reviewing whether to move the command tower on Ford-class carriers to the center of the ships following aesthetic concerns from the White House.

U.S. Navy Reviews Aircraft Carrier Redesign Following Requests From President Trump

The Facts

Who
The U.S. Navy, President Trump, and maritime strategists.
What
The U.S. Navy is performing an internal review to consider moving the "island" (command tower) on Ford-class aircraft carriers to the middle of the ship's deck, rather than its current rearward position.
When
The review was reported Sunday, following a presidential directive regarding catapult systems on Thursday.
Where
Washington, D.C. and U.S. Navy shipbuilding facilities.
Why
The review aims to address aesthetic concerns expressed by President Trump regarding the design of the nation's newest class of $22 billion aircraft carriers.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. Invalid Date

    USS Gerald R. Ford captain defends island placement for operational efficiency

  2. Invalid Date

    CBO estimates Ford-class cost at $22 billion per ship

    Estimate from nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

  3. August 13, 2026

    President Trump directs Navy to return to steam catapult systems

  4. August 15, 2026

    Reports emerge that Navy is reviewing island redesign to match Trump preferences

The U.S. Navy is conducting an internal review of a potential redesign for Ford-class aircraft carriers that would relocate the ship's command center tower. A former senior U.S. official stated the review is weighing the possibility of moving the tower, known as the "island," toward the middle of the vessel to align with the appearance of older warships following aesthetic concerns expressed by President Trump.

The island serves as the nerve center for a carrier, housing flight-deck operations, tactical command, and navigation systems. On the current Ford-class design, the island is positioned further back than on previous ship classes. Navy Capt. Paul Lanzilotta, a former commander of the USS Gerald R. Ford, stated in 2022 that this placement provides more space for aircraft to line up and troubleshoot before takeoff, increasing the speed and efficiency of flight operations.

Critics of the potential redesign, including former Navy Maritime Strategist Hunter Stires, argue that changing the island's position for aesthetic reasons would be a wasteful use of engineering resources and taxpayer funds. Stires noted that the current placement was specifically chosen to maximize aircraft sorties, which he described as the primary measure of a carrier's combat power. The Navy is expected to complete its internal review of the island's placement in several weeks.

For taxpayers and federal budget planners, a redesign could involve significant financial changes. While a specific dollar amount for moving the island was not reported, the source noted that another recent presidential directive to replace electromagnetic catapults with steam systems could cost billions of dollars. Sailors and flight deck crews would notice a concrete change in their daily work environment, as the island's location determines the amount of deck space available for taxiing, maintenance, and launching aircraft. According to Capt. Lanzilotta, the current design allows for quicker resets of aircraft systems without interrupting the overall flow of deck operations.

A decision to move the island would establish a precedent of presidential involvement in the technical engineering specifications of naval architecture based on visual preferences. This follows a National Security Memo in which President Trump ordered the service to revert to steam-powered catapults and hydraulic systems rather than the newer Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and Advanced Weapons Elevators. The Navy's internal review will determine if these structural changes are feasible for the vessels currently under construction. The final report on the island redesign is due in the coming weeks.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: U.S. Navy Reviews Aircraft Carrier Redesign Following Requests From President Trump?

The U.S. Navy is performing an internal review to consider moving the "island" (command tower) on Ford-class aircraft carriers to the middle of the ship's deck, rather than its current rearward position.

Who is involved?

The U.S. Navy, President Trump, and maritime strategists.

When did this happen?

The review was reported Sunday, following a presidential directive regarding catapult systems on Thursday.

Where did this happen?

Washington, D.C. and U.S. Navy shipbuilding facilities.

Why does this matter?

The review aims to address aesthetic concerns expressed by President Trump regarding the design of the nation's newest class of $22 billion aircraft carriers.