The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

Legal

Zillow and Redfin Settle Antitrust Claims Over Apartment Listing Competition

Zillow and Redfin settled an FTC lawsuit over a 2025 deal that allegedly inflated rental listing prices by 14.5% after Redfin stopped competing.

Published August 24, 2026 at 9:11 AM EDT

The short answer

Zillow and Redfin settled an FTC lawsuit over a 2025 deal that allegedly inflated rental listing prices by 14.5% after Redfin stopped competing. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and a coalition of five states reached a settlement with Zillow on Monday, resolving allegations that the real estate platform paid Redfin $100 million to stop competing in the apartment rental listing market.

Zillow and Redfin Settle Antitrust Claims Over Apartment Listing Competition

The Facts

Who
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Zillow, Redfin, and the attorneys general of New York, Virginia, Arizona, Connecticut, and Washington.
What
A settlement between the FTC, five states, Zillow, and Redfin regarding antitrust claims in the apartment rental listing market.
When
Monday, August 24, 2026
Where
United States
Why
To resolve claims that Zillow illegally paid Redfin $100 million to stop competing in the rental market, which allegedly raised advertising costs by 14.5%.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. February 1, 2025

    Zillow and Redfin enter partnership agreement

  2. August 24, 2026

    FTC and five states settle with Zillow ahead of trial

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and a coalition of five states reached a settlement with Zillow on Monday, resolving allegations that the real estate platform paid Redfin $100 million to stop competing in the apartment rental listing market. The agreement, filed just before a scheduled trial, requires Redfin to resume its own rental advertising business within six months. While Redfin will once again operate as a competitor, the settlement allows it to continue displaying Zillow advertisements on its platforms through at least 2030.

The legal action originated from a February 2025 agreement between the two companies. Under that deal, Redfin agreed to wind down its rental listing operations for up to nine years, refer its customers to Zillow, and display Zillow’s listings on its own website. In exchange, Zillow paid Redfin $100 million plus additional fees for renter leads. The FTC and attorneys general from New York, Virginia, Arizona, Connecticut, and Washington sued to block the partnership, alleging it violated antitrust laws by eliminating competition for buildings with more than 25 units.

Attorneys for the government planned to argue that the deal harmed the market by increasing costs for landlords and lowering the quality of information available to renters. Zillow defended the partnership in court filings, stating that exclusive deals are a standard industry practice and that the arrangement allowed it to compete more effectively against the market leader, CoStar Group. Zillow also maintained that the partnership actually increased the total number of listings available to consumers across both websites.

The scale of the settlement involves a $100 million payment that was central to the original 2025 deal, which the government sought to dismantle. By forcing Redfin to re-enter the market, regulators are attempting to reverse a trend that they claim reduced the number of platforms available for apartment searches. FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson noted that the settlement aligns with federal efforts to address the cost of living and housing competition. The immediate impact for users will be the reappearance of Redfin’s independent rental advertising services, which must be operational by February 2027 based on the six-month deadline.

What happens next: Redfin must begin the process of rebuilding its rental advertising infrastructure immediately to meet the six-month deadline. While Redfin resumes independent operations, its existing partnership to display Zillow’s inventory will remain active for at least the next four years. This resolution concludes the specific litigation brought by the FTC and the states of New York, Virginia, Arizona, Connecticut, and Washington. The settlement serves as a marker for U.S. antitrust authorities' ongoing focus on the housing sector and the digital platforms that manage real estate transactions.

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. See our editorial standards, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Zillow and Redfin Settle Antitrust Claims Over Apartment Listing Competition?

A settlement between the FTC, five states, Zillow, and Redfin regarding antitrust claims in the apartment rental listing market.

Who is involved?

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Zillow, Redfin, and the attorneys general of New York, Virginia, Arizona, Connecticut, and Washington.

When did this happen?

Monday, August 24, 2026

Where did this happen?

United States

Why does this matter?

To resolve claims that Zillow illegally paid Redfin $100 million to stop competing in the rental market, which allegedly raised advertising costs by 14.5%.