The Plain Record

Neutral daily news — clear headlines, complete facts.

National

Proposed West Virginia Data Center Project Faces Local Opposition and Legal Challenges

A proposed multi-thousand-acre data center in West Virginia faces legal challenges from residents concerned about light pollution and environmental impacts.

Published November 7, 2026 at 5:36 PM EST

The short answer

A proposed multi-thousand-acre data center in West Virginia faces legal challenges from residents concerned about light pollution and environmental impacts. Fundamental Data LLC, a Virginia-based company, has proposed a large-scale data and energy infrastructure project called Ridgeline for a site in Tucker County, West Virginia. The project includes a 785-megawatt power plant designed to support artificial intelligence and cloud computing.

Proposed West Virginia Data Center Project Faces Local Opposition and Legal Challenges

The Facts

Who
Fundamental Data LLC, Tucker United, Governor Patrick Morrisey, House Speaker Roger Hanshaw.
What
Proposed data center development and related legal/legislative actions.
When
Proposed in March 2025; legal challenges ongoing as of October 2026.
Where
Tucker County and Grant County, West Virginia.
Why
The project involves a 785-megawatt power plant and thousands of acres of development, raising questions about economic benefits versus environmental and dark-sky impacts.

Fundamental Data LLC, a Virginia-based company, has proposed a large-scale data and energy infrastructure project called Ridgeline for a site in Tucker County, West Virginia. The project includes a 785-megawatt power plant designed to support artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The development is planned for a reclaimed coal-mining site and could eventually cover thousands of acres, potentially extending into neighboring Grant County.

The project began moving forward in March 2025, when a public notice was published regarding an air-quality permit for the power plant. Shortly thereafter, the West Virginia legislature passed a bill that exempts high-impact data centers and microgrid districts from local zoning, noise, viewshed, and lighting restrictions. Governor Patrick Morrisey (R) signed the legislation, citing a need to focus on economic development and job creation through the state's natural resources.

Residents and local advocacy groups, including Tucker United, have challenged the project due to concerns over environmental impacts. The Northern Virginia Astronomy Club reported that the initial footprint could increase sky glow near Blackwater Falls State Park by 528%, potentially affecting the park’s dark-sky certification efforts. Furthermore, opponents raised concerns regarding air pollution and the safety of storing 30 million gallons of diesel fuel near water supplies. Fundamental Data representative Casey Chapman stated the facility will use well-designed lighting to minimize sky glow and will operate within the emissions limits set by the state.

A lawsuit filed by Tucker United, the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, and the Sierra Club challenging the project's air-quality permit was dismissed in August on jurisdictional grounds. The groups stated they intend to appeal the decision to the West Virginia Supreme Court. Critics also pointed to a potential conflict of interest involving West Virginia House Speaker Roger Hanshaw, whose law firm represents Fundamental Data in the litigation. Hanshaw stated he is not employed by the company but confirmed his firm serves as its counsel.

For the surrounding community and visitors, the project represents a change in the local landscape and environment. The analysis from the Northern Virginia Astronomy Club indicates that sky glow could shift the nighttime environment from rural to suburban in appearance, which may impact amateur astronomers and outdoor recreation businesses like the White Grass Ski Touring Center. Opponents also commissioned an analysis claiming the plant could result in $19 million to $35 million in annual health-related damages, though the company maintains it will operate within legal safety limits.

The project sets a precedent for how West Virginia balances its industrial history with its growing tourism and recreation economy. The state law signed in 2025 removes traditional local oversight of these facilities, shifting control from municipal leaders like Davis Mayor Alan Tomson to state-level regulators. While Governor Morrisey has recently proposed a 20-year plan for "responsible" data center development, the current project continues to move through the legal system. The next step in the process involves the planned appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court.

Timeline of what happened

Key dates and decisions, in the order they occurred.

  1. March 1, 2025

    Notice for air-quality permit published in local newspaper

  2. April 1, 2025

    State legislature passes bill exempting data centers from local zoning

  3. August 1, 2026

    Court dismisses air-permit challenge on jurisdictional grounds

Summaries are written by The Plain Record to state the facts of a story plainly and without political slant. Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the source record before publication. See how we report, or report a correction.

← Back to the front page

Questions readers ask

What happened: Proposed West Virginia Data Center Project Faces Local Opposition and Legal Challenges?

Fundamental Data LLC, a Virginia-based company, has proposed a large-scale data and energy infrastructure project called Ridgeline for a site in Tucker County, West Virginia. The project includes a 785-megawatt power plant designed to support artificial intelligence and cloud computing.

Who is involved?

Fundamental Data LLC, Tucker United, Governor Patrick Morrisey, House Speaker Roger Hanshaw.

When did this happen?

Proposed in March 2025; legal challenges ongoing as of October 2026.

Where did this happen?

Tucker County and Grant County, West Virginia.

Why does this matter?

The project involves a 785-megawatt power plant and thousands of acres of development, raising questions about economic benefits versus environmental and dark-sky impacts.